• interceder270@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course.

            If you’re trying to say they need fake meat though, then you’d be sorely mistaken.

            • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The “non-fake” meat is extremely wasteful. Lab-grown meat still has many problems, but at least 99% of the calories are not spent on keeping a cow alive in cruel conditions.

                  • interceder270@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    A realistic one to apply to our societies?

                    Realistically, all the money spent on fake meat research could be spent on providing food for those who are starving.

                    These people don’t get to choose between fake meat or real meat. It’s either starve and die or starve and die.

                    Fake meat is just for the incredibly small pool of affluent individuals who think consuming animals is wrong but maximizing profit is not. Where do they get the money for this anyways in a world where children go without food, water, shelter, electricity, and education? I guess these affluent individuals should have more before those kids.