Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • Forester@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It is if your intention is to not introduce carbon into the atmosphere over the 60 year life’s lifespan to 90 year lifespan of the power plant

    • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Then, the priority should still be renewables, because they are far cheaper, can be build faster and if they malfunction, no one is in danger. France has enough Nuclear to deal with no-sun and no-wind phases (if they work fine, which is the other problem with nuclear energy in France)…

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Great! At the current rate it’ll only take them 200 more years to replace all their old time bombs.