Lemmy should rely less on JavaScript.
Currently without JS you can’t even expand the main menu.

Additionally, all those controls should also work without JS.
Or worse option - since they only work with JS, don’t show them when JS is disabled.

  • ksynwa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    UI and backend are separate so a UI can be created which doesn’t use JS.

    There are only two devs working on the project and the backend takes most of their time. Using JS in the UI expedites the process of implementing features which may be why they went for it.

    • remram@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      The user experience on javascript-enabled browsers is also really great. Going for a nojs-first approach would hurt UX a lot, especially on mobile.

        • efg@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          No, because app shouldn’t be required. It should be simple website with RWD, nothing special.

          • Tmpod@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I agree. And the app uses flutter which isn’t good in lower end devices (such as my Redmi 4X), so it’s not ideal.

        • remram@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I don’t want to install an app to get the same experience as the website but without tabs.

      • efg@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        “Going for a nojs-first approach would hurt UX a lot, especially on mobile.”

        WTF?!

        • Tmpod@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          It would. If used properly, JS can have really improve UI/UX. Sure, you can make good JS-free pages, but JS can make it easier and arguably better (by being more dynamic, which appeals to a wider audience than static pages).

          • Echedenyan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Not having that into account makes it harder when you want to replace it without JS and doing more requests to the server side.

            It is preferable that if you use JS in the begining to make it easier, take into account that possibility.

            Maybe, as a WebDev student I didn’t finish yet and can learn more into the basics, but the things I learned doing a replacement to Disqus in JSP without JS, later compared with the project this year with similar requirements but adding JS in the client side, got me into this.