Not sure why Signal gets all the attention when Matrix is much more successful at spreading open source messaging and is also decentralized.

  • thervingi@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Of course it does. It just doesn’t have E2E encryption by default (you can turn it on with secret chats). If the alternative is messaging on Instagram, Facebook Messenger or WhatzApp, then Telegram is superiour.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      listen to yourself, it doesn’t have e2e encryption by default?? So the telegram servers can see your chats, that’s not acceptable for a chat software.

      e2e also doesn’t work in groups on telegram the last time I checked, so the chat with a couple of friends is out for grabs by whatever jurisdiction telegram is operating under as well, great.

      Signal is like 5 times better than this, so is whatsapp (depends though) and of course matrix or xmpp. Comparing it to instagram messaging is a joke.

      • thervingi@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        We actually don’t know what WhatsApp is doing. It’s a closed source app, so there is nothing preventing Facebook from getting your keys and reading your chats. It just takes one national security letter to force them.

        Telegram wins because it’s usable by non-techies. And has open source clients. And has a decent Linux client. It’s preferable to chatting over Instagram.

          • thervingi@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Why do you think WhatsApp has E2EE? It’s a closed source app. There is nothing preventing Facebook from grabbing your keys.

            • @noc.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              @thervingi
              Probably the fact that if news slipped out, it would have been (one of) the biggest scandles facebook has ever done, and I dont personally think its worth the risk for them.

              • thervingi@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                That’s what NDA’s are for :) Facebook got away with a lot worse.

                Also it might not be Facebook’s decision. It takes one national security letter from the FISA court to force them.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              on Telegram they wouldn’t even have to grab your keys, they can just run data collection on all their users unnoticed, without breaking any promises.