• shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Having a criminal history would likely make him ineligible.

      There’s no outright rule against it but several people have been removed from the order for committing crimes.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      NDP leader already announced he’s stepping down and I feel like the conservative has to as well.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    I’m happy for you Canada.

    You succeeded where America couldn’t.

    Are y’all accepting asylum for programmers / tech professionals?

    • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you’re serious, start looking for companies hiring up here. As I understand it’s not easy, even for economic class immigrants, but I work in tech and I work with many immigrants (albeit not usually from the US, but it’s a different world now). Mind you - please look carefully into the financial impacts as it is a change from the US. Salaries are lower and taxes generally higher, which may or may not be offset in your context in other ways (healthcare a big one, income tax deductions, etc.) But many people, myself included, prefer Canada regardless of the reduced compensation. It’s not always about money.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Asylum, not yet. There’s still a treat on the books recognising America as equivalently safe. Presumably it will get rolled back soon.

      If you’re serious, I can send you to the points quiz for economic immigrants.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        What happens when a ‘safe third country’ starts adopting extractionary systems left behind by colonial empires that have, in part, held back third world economies for decades? Keep an eye on America to find out!

        I’m sure America’s substantial purchasing power will help prevent the rot from spreading within. Right? Right?!

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Even more unaffordable for an American. They need to have bankroll to survive a year without income and that includes covering possible medical expenses for 3 months. I have friends who have wanted to move here for years and the hurdles are large even with skills and secondary education. Only those with highly in demand educated skills get an easier path.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        No different in America, and corporations are buying up homes so they can jack the prices up even higher. MAGA wants a population of renters so that they can control us by threatening us with homelessness.

    • twice_hatch@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I can but they won’t let my friends in. I didn’t realize until I looked into it but national borders are actually quite rigid

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You’d have to build new roots in a new place. I’ll admit I worry that I’m running out of time for that at my age, or at the very least the window is closing.

        Makes me feel pretty depressed. I’m not super happy with the landscape of people I have to interact with. I have a lot of decent friends but I feel like the number of very close friendships I have is zero due to a lot of major value differences and low population.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m feeling the same way. I’ve been mostly “stuck” in wherever I just ended up. Part of me really does fantasize about fleeing somewhere better, especially being in a part of the US with an absolutely abysmal education record (and it shows. Oh boy.)

          But besides the resources, I don’t have some ultra compelling reason for a non-volatile nation to bother letting me in.

          There’s cool people here, and I try to get along with whomever, but forming relationships feels really high stakes these days since contested politics and tribalism is infecting every facet of peoples’ lives.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    this outcome has less to do with trump’s actions, and more to do with how the conservatives behaved in spite of those actions.

    I think enough people were like me, ready to vote conservative, but then lost faith in the party since they didnt really seem to have a plan on anything once trudeau was gone early. Pollievre’s stock tanked once people saw that Trudeau was gone, and what was happening in the world

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Genuine question, what initially led you to wanting to vote conservative and what could they have run on for you to have stuck with then?

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I don’t know that ‘Conservative’ exists anymore. I’m American, but I think these comments work everywhere else, as Authoritarianism rises.

      Growing up, I believed that liberal/conservative was just a difference in approach, but not a difference in end-goal. Both ‘teams’ wanted the country to prosper. In my 40s, now, I clearly see that we have different goals: Liberals want everyone to be prosperous, healthy, fulfilled. Conservatives value the prosperity only of those on top.

      You may identify as conservative, little ‘c’, respect tradition and be careful with spending, etc; but I want you to closely evaluate the actions of people using that label across the globe. A vote for a conservative or right-wing candidate is a vote for the top 1% or less of the population of the planet. They may align with you on some topics, such as religion, abortion, fiscal policies, regulations, and more; but that is a ploy and they are absolutely willing to throw you away as soon as they have your vote and will cut everything you depend on once in power in order to pad their own pockets.

      There are certainly perverse incentives and systemic issues that make even liberal politicians support bad policies, but the voter bloc that is ‘liberal’ wants to make things better for everyone. The conservative politicians, at least in the US where I’m paying attention, seem to be hell-bent on making things worse instead.

      This has less to do with Trump’s actions, and more to do with how the convervatives behaved…

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        This has been my experience as well and I’d like to highlight your insightful point on how it seemed like both options were still trying to work towards a greater good decades ago.

        Modern day conservatism seems entirely based on the ethos that inclusivity has gone too far. Since the world has become (in a very general and oversimplfying sense) more fair and inclusive over time, the ideology now feels inherently regressive.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The line between regressive and conservative is so hard to define. However the former certainly is in ascendancy in America.

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Explain how they gained more seats then.

      The conservatives barely lost because the progressives and the BQ voters cut their legs off to hoist up the liberals.

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ironically, Trudeau hanging around for a long as he did may have saved Canada. If this election had happened in the middle of last year, the Conservatives would have probably won and combined with Trump, it would have been a disaster. Possibly the smartest/luckiest thing he has ever done.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        in this case it was the early voter turnout and the special ballots that really lifted it. And we cannot ever forget Bloc. They did a huge push on this one. No one hates Trump quite as much as Quebecois and they showed it 20 fold. Quite a ride watching all this. Especially what with the cyber attacks on the PM during this short campaign was relentless as was the propaganda radios. It honestly should be a case study on how out of control the propaganda was getting on X and facebook.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Narrowly.

    Are you guys not horrified of what’s happening south? If you interpret this as a win and go on, your country is going to be mega conservative in like a decade.

    No, this is an existential crisis, and you need to shut off the propaganda machines before it’s too late.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s after a full decade of Liberal rule. Do you know how hard it is to win after that long being blamed for everyone’s problems? THis is huge.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Agreed. Incumbents always do worse in the next election. Makes me shudder to think what the result of the next election is going to be. Trudeau’s latest term was really bad and they got no punishment for it whatsoever thanks to the gift from the south. And Canada seems to be moving further and further away from proportional representation. So who will voters swing to next election?

      Great result for today’s Canadians. Terrifying result for future Canadians.

      • AtomicPinecone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I would point out though that a CPC win would have been a terrifying result for future AND current Canadians. So I guess that’s a small win?

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Quite true. The reason for celebration is that had the conservatives won they were planning to defund our public broadcaster right off the bat. We need all kinds of reforms but having the CBC around to report on them will be quite important.

    • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Look, we’ve had the liberals for ten years now. Theyve won 4 elections at this point. It’s amazing they won anything at all this time.

      • jellygoose@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Justin fatigue was real. Carney coming in, demolishing the only thing the conservative dingdongs were campaigning about and just being overall a very respectable candidate turned things around. Along with the orange monkey down there.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It was mostly Trump. Americans polls did something similar after 9/11. The candidates involved just put it over the top.

          • shawn1122@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Too close from whose perspective?

            The liberals had no business winning this election. All metrifs pointed to a conservwtive land slide until Trump got involved and Carney seemingly handled him better than Trudeau.

            Carney is going to have to perform above average in his first term otherwise the liberals will be absolutely decimated in 4 years.

            This is borrowed time. Even an average performance now will guarantee Poilievre a win in 4 years. The Liberals are going to have to get more done in 4 years than they have in the past 10 to prevent that.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              48 minutes ago

              Mine,

              Conservatives policies aren’t beneficial for the average Canadian. 40% of people voting against, their, and my best interests is not something I like. The cons and pp don’t care about climate change. That affects all of us,they want more American style Healthcare, that affects all of us. They want to lower taxes, great! Where do they get the money to do that? By cutting our services.

          • CuffsOffWilly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Considering the massive lead the conservatives once had it isn’t really ‘that’ close. Liberal gains were astonishing once Carney entered the ring.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              40%+ of voters still went for pp. That’s too high, and with our shitty fptp, it made it worse

              • shawn1122@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I don’t know thats its too high especially of it was going to be much more than that if not for Trump’s threats, Trudeau’s resignation and Carney’s ascension.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      What do you mean “narrowly”? It’s a clean victory and the trumpist conservative leader lost his own riding.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Liberals projected to hold a slim minority, the NPD was all but annihilated, Liberals will be forced to reach across the isle and work with the BQ.

        Are the Bloc easier to work with than the NDP? history suggests no.

        • charles@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not quite. There’s still enough polls left to report that could lead to a Liberal majority, even if that doesn’t happen (it’s quite unlikely), then current projections are that the NDP will have enough seats to support the minority government, even though the Bloc will hold more seats overall than the NDP.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The numbers allow a continuation of a Liberal-NDP confidence-and-supply arrangement. This is a good result for those of us who don’t trust a banker to not sell out the working class.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The numbers allow a continuation of a Liberal-NDP confidence-and-supply arrangement.

            Or a less formal agreement, if there is no appetite for a similar arrangement as last time.

            Or, my preference, working to consensus with both BQ and NDP.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Or a more formal agreement. I’ve heard some complaining about not having any NDP ministers, but I don’t know if that’s mainstream.

              Or, my preference, working to consensus with both BQ and NDP.

              Eh, it sounds like the Bloc really wants a rematch. Now’s not the time to risk that.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                it sounds like the Bloc really wants a rematch.

                I doubt they’ll try to topple the government until the threat of Trump is neutralized. Or at least significantly muted. They have a common goal with the rest of the country on that issue.

                Plus, what’s their warchest look like at the moment?

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Yeah, I don’t know for sure. I was going off of what Chantal said on CBC, but the again she though the last government would be short lived, too.