Ah yes, thank you for an actual answer. 😄

You’ll wake up and…

“Hey, you’re finally awake” Skyrim Theme Intensifies

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/EM_Spectrum_Properties_edit.svg/660px-EM_Spectrum_Properties_edit.svg.png

Anything not labeled “Radio” still works.

Its not supposed to be very precise and scientific, this is a hypothetical. Just want to know what happens to society if there’s suddenly no radio communication.

I mean like, anything in the “Radio Wave” frequencies just stops working. Everything else works. No EMP or anything, just “Magic”

(C’mon, I just want to see how society would function without any radios)

No exactly what I meant. I mean, only the Radio portion of the EM spectrum stops working.

So is that a good thing, or no?

I mean, would you rather have known? Maybe he didn’t want you to be sad?

Instance blocking does not also block users

“Claim Denied”

Then his death become breaking news in New York City.

Bruh.

My germaphobia would just make me kms

Yo what?

Defending the Borders of allies like Ukraine: Nope

Randomly taking other country’s land: Yes

Wtf?

Is he even taking it for the US? Or is he gonna sell it to russia?

and the intellectual level of the people here is much higher

Lmao, not really.

I’m no genius, I just googled for 5 minutes and figured out what the federation and drcentralization means. Anyone above the IQ of 80 could understand it, if they are willing to spend the time to read it.

But most people are just too lazy to read it and think fediverse is “too complicated”.

Nowhere to deport to? Internment Concentration Camp you go!

🙃

…

😖

The good news is courts are slow and dockets fill up fast. There’s only so much they can do with that.

But executive orders are legal until a judge strikes it down… so… 👀

that doesn’t sound good… 😖

Its more in the catagory of “killing the murderer of my child”, but replace child with millions of US residents who couldn’t afford treatments due to arbitrary denial of coverage

It may be murder, but this then brings the question: “Should a jury be allowed to be instructed to, not only being the judge of facts, but also the judge of law?” (aka: should a jury receive the instruction that they are allowed to acquit even if they technically committed a crime, but the jury feels the law should not be applied in this circumstance? They are technically always able to to that via Jury Nullification, but they never are allowed to receive that instruction that they are allowed to.)

On Lemmy?

Lemmy has a bias against the ceo so you’ll just have a thread of everyone (including me) agreeing with the sentinment that the ceo deserved it, so it wouldn’t really be a debate.

Reddit will have less of a bias, but then reddit doesn’t really like you talking about this topic, and your thread will mysteriously get deleted. Honestly I’m not sure theres really a place on the internet where you actually have an unbiased audience to debate this, and not get censored. You’ll have to look IRL for people to debate.

You can try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world

or !AskUSA@discuss.online actually nvm, they don’t like overtly political posts… 🤷‍♂️

or !chat@beehaw.org

but, again, you’ll get a very biased audience

Good suggestions, however, I don’t think even pigeon carriers will stop yourself from mysteriously dying of suicide with 2 shots in the back of your head.

More like Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo

Its:

“shhh… nothing is broken, ignore all the bugs and pretend it all just works, mm’kay?”

sh.itjust.works

School aint teaching this shit. That would imply that you should be a whistleblower or be a witness to wrongdoings. No way governments would let this be taught.

This is what parents should be teaching at home.

key word: feasibly