After all, that is a privilege reserved for politicians.

Would you say Charlie’s proposal was… shot down?

Well, I don’t expect you to know this, but police are actually not supposed to punch protestors. Or anyone else, really. Hope this helps 🤗!

There was a second punch a few seconds after, but this article’s video didn’t show it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SUln5weESQ At 1:15 and 1:31

The last time a country was suspected of breaking the non-proliferation treaty, it was pre-emptively attacked with thousands of civilians dead and injured, and our European leaders said how justified that attack was.

But I’m sure going back on that will work just fine for us.

“forced” to play

because the path of the gamer isn’t a choice™

What’s the matter, big boy, can’t compete in the free market? Is your job too hard? Do you need more subsidies? Yeah? Tariffs on Chinese cars? Shall the politicians come over and fuck your wife as well?

Judging by the comments, reading the article seems to be a lost art. Here’s the image for y’all:

It’s very specifically about 18-24 year olds, compared to last year, with video games seeing the steepest decrease.

You can stop complaining about games being soulless, unless you want to claim that wasn’t a problem last year. Well, you can, but it’s unrelated then. Compared to last year, this age group has felt the need to cut back at everything more so than anyone else.

Here’s the thread mentioned in the article. Suspected reason is restarting of student loan payments and difficult job market.

Ah yes, the “it’s been 3000 years” guy, genuinely one of the series best moments.

What else was there? The villain? Whack. The champ? Whack. The prof? Whack. The 5 rivals? Whack. I don’t think 2 great scenes make a good story, no matter how elaborate the lore.

Thank you for your input, but I won’t leave my mountain to fight you on your hill.

Yeah, we’re all mad, fuck the suits and all that.

But why does the distinction between “real-world adult material” and “creative, non-realistic”, “artistic, animated works” that “do no harm” matter? Last time I checked, realistic adult material can be just as artistic, and the harm done by negligently letting children watch it seems comparable.

Are they in favour of age verification for “uncreative, realistic” pornography, or is the real distinction just between real-life and online?

???

What does the US have to do with anything I said?

If only the “tax the rich” petition had such a great villain to reinvigorate interest, but I take what I can get.

If you visit the official website of krafton https://www.krafton.com/en/ you should get this pop up:

Basically, Krafton claims that the 3 founders they fired did not do their job in overseeing the project, leading to a game without any direction. Since the game would not meet their standards, they decided to rework a lot and push the release date back.

This is an official statement of a company, meaning they can be (and if I read it correctly have been) sued for slander should they lie here. So a legal department looked over this and decided “Yep, we can claim that they abandoned responsibilities, we can prove that in court”. Whether or not this is actually true or just an attempt to regain public opinion, it’s a real shitshow.

This, too, is c/fuckcars.

“desire paths” well and good, but who (above the age of 15) is jumping a hedge to save 3 second walk time? Must be next to a school.

OpenTTD. Trains go vroom.

Had it on my radar for a while, didn’t think I would like it this much. Boy was I wrong, my sleep is as badly scheduled as my trains.

If east Germany loves Putin so much, let Russia rule them once more.

I’m not fighting Russia for them. No matter how hopeless the economic situation, they made their bed and can now lie in it.

And to be honest CDU politicians aren’t much better. In the 6 months they have shown once more that their only loyalties are to the party and the stock market, not the country or the people.

I don’t fully agree that Israel is violating international law. When a country’s existence is being questioned by Iran or Hamas, it’s not so easy to respond strictly within the framework of international law,

So if you read international law strictly, it is a violation of it she just disagrees with? She was imo better than our current ICC-ignoring Merz, but come on.

People should reflect how they reacted to this article of Germany’s options to develop nukes from 3 months ago. While seen as “scummy”, I doubt anyone would accept a preemptive strike on countries doing what the article calls “nuclear hedging”.

This moment is when I realised the great loss of the closure of lemee, as we no longer can look at how c/Europe reacted to the article “Nuclear bomb for Germany” 3 months ago.

If I remember correctly, like the article claims, “nuclear hedging” was seen as scummy way around the NPT, not a direct violation of it.

Please don’t see me as arguing “He didn’t, and if he did it wasn’t that bad”- I’m simply a different person from the one you argued before.