• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: May 16th, 2026

help-circle








  • Yeah OK, I just had to read that twice to see you’re right.

    The title is ambiguous (or perhaps vague, more accurately).

    “doesn’t let me use my 32 char password” can be interpreted as:

    • it does not allow passwords of 32 characters in length, regardless of composition

    • it does allow passwords of 32 characters in length, which should be sufficient with or without special characters

    In one reading, the special character requirement is the issue. In the other, the length.

    Yay for English.





  • Yeah, this is a major issue across the board. For a wide variety of products, if they clearly marked which were AI generated, then the sales would likely speak for themselves.

    But companies don’t really want to do this. They want to mix AI slop in with regular products, so that over time, the average consumer dumbs down enough to no longer know the difference. Then they just generate every product ever and number go up.

    This still ignores the fact that no one will have money to put into the system from the bottom (which is the only way it flows in an economy), but here we are.



  • You can change your name to whatever you want. Imagine if your last name were Epstein, or Trump. No one would question your motivation.

    This is a bit of an oversimplification.

    If in the US, you can generally change your name at whim, usually after a petition and fee. But it depends on your state. Some states require a hearing to do a name change. Some require a publication, and some will only allow the change after a waiting period.

    All states will generally deny name change requests which are deemed to be fraudulent (details of that depend on state), to avoid debt, or to be harmful/hateful to others. Sometimes the definitions of these terms is not terribly clear, in which case the state can simply deny it with vague reasoning.

    Edit: ans apologies if this isn’t in the US. I’m not familiar with other systems.





  • To look at this another way: the government of South Korea has decided to give people the feeling of a strike without actually letting it affect bottom lines in any meaningful way. That is, they have relegated the strike (a key utility of those fighting for workers’ rights) to being a tool used solely to assuage discontent in the short term. Without economic teeth, it cannot be used to enhance the lives of workers, which is ultimately the explicit goal of any strike.

    South Korea is of course not alone in reducing or eliminating the rights of its citizens so that corporations continue to profit at their expense.