Agree. From an organization that advocates for aggressive censorship I don’t feel they can be trusted on this topic. Plus net neutrality is just a give away to big tech so they don’t have to pay for their bandwidth use, they get subsidized
Agree. From an organization that advocates for aggressive censorship I don’t feel they can be trusted on this topic. Plus net neutrality is just a give away to big tech so they don’t have to pay for their bandwidth use, they get subsidized
Good for them to stand up for principals over mob lunacy.
Interesting site. I’m thinking something that would be flatly apolitical. Just a service, use as you please. Most of these looking to have their biases seep into the terms of service
I couldn’t tell from their website of they offer all the services they list, or its a very cool directory of fediverse offerings
I think Signal is what it is… An encrypted centralized messenger that is free. I trust that they actually do encrypt the messages and are not spying or selling the contents. Outside of that they can do whatever they want as long as they deliver on that core service
Hate speech is a term made to silence others and their thought. Anyone who believes that they alone can determine what words can be spoken is not in favor of free speech. This is one topic where there is no grey. Advocates of silencing others in the name of “hate speech” are themselves practitioners of hate, pure and simple. They have hate for the free thought of others.
Mozilla saying that people should be silenced is the greatest act of hate there is. They themselves are guilty of hate speech.