nickwitha_k (he/him)

  • 0 Posts
  • 155 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • I think that I have an answer for you.

    From the other comments, it sounds like you’re using a dynamic mic. So, you can very likely rule out phantom power as, while they may exist, I’m not aware of any dynamic mics that use phantom power.

    Additionally, from your original post, you note that you are using an XLR to phono adapter to connect and can get some signal, if you crank up the boost.

    Are you by chance running direct from the mic to the on-board soundcard?

    If so, that is probably your issue. The mic-in on most non-audio production soundcards isn’t designed for this. They are intended for things like electret condensor mics that have built-in pre-amps or others that produce a signal that is closer to line-level.

    Most stage and studio mics that use XLR connections produce a very low signal that is intended to run through a pre-amplifier to bring it up to line-level before it goes to tape/DAW/PA power amp.

    So, my recommendation would be to take one of two routes:

    1. Obtain a mic pre-amp and add it to your signal chain between the mic and computer.

    2. Obtain an audio interface that contains a decent mic pre-amp.

    I would recommend the second, if practical as the ADCs in on-board soundcards are historically mediocre to poor. You will probably be much happier with the result.













  • I know you already got it but a few others came to my mind:

    Finnish, which not a tonal language:

    • Sinä pidät kahvista. (“You like coffee.”)
    • Pidätkö kahvista? (“You like coffee?”)

    Japanese:

    • Anata wa kōhī ga sukidesu. (“You like coffee.”)
    • Kōhī wa sukidesu ka? (“You like coffee?”)

    I think you’ll find the pattern of question words/suffixes in nearly every language that is not explicitly tonal.




  • Like many Internet phenomena of recent years, NNN has been used as part of the far-right/chauvinist movement. Lots of weird and biologically incorrect stuff going around surrounding it too. I think that far-right movements think that they can leverage male sexual frustration to drive people to violence and other nefarious activities - sexual denial seems weirdly common in extremist right-wing groups, across cultures. Seriously. It’s weird.


  • You’re not wrong for trying to find another solution. Unfortunately, I think, in this case, your up against fundamental Linux permissions. One possibility would be running the work in a container with reduced capabilities but, it really is going to depend on what behaviors you’re trying to avoid.

    Overall, it’s likely a better idea to re-install because noone should be running stuff directly as root in the majority of production scenarios.




  • I’m not sure that we’re on the same page or set of definitions. Of course not every skill depends on linguistic literacy.

    Take skateboarding, for example. Yes, there could be some theory, potentially (I’m clearly not a skater) but much of the skill is in learning how to physically operate the board as an extension of one’s body. This is a “natural” sort of skill that meshes well with our evolved neurobiology (ie perception, motor function, physical coordination, etc.)

    Now, let’s look at written language. It is NOT a “natural” sort of skill. It MUST be taught and learned with effort because our neurobiology has not evolved to account for the sorts of tasks involved. Writing is an abstract thing that requires abstract thinking to really understand - the word “lion” is not literally a lion, which is not a simple task to grasp for an untrained brain.

    Next, computing. A computer and what it does is incredibly abstract. A bunch of pieces of specially-shaped stone, use an invisible force to represent presence and absence (the concept of “zero” is only in recorded use for the last 3800 years or so and ancient greeks didn’t even have a symbol for it). By performing ever more complex mathematics on these stones, we can create tools that people can use to perform abstract, and in some cases, physical work. And these interactions are nearly all performed based upon instructions that people write in text-based languages that don’t even match up with natural languages.

    Even if not, technically illiterate people can actually read a button or menu item.

    And this is part of the origin of the issue inflicted upon younger people. In the US, literacy programs were largely replaced by programs literally designed to help people that are illiterate take care of their basic needs in a society that depends on written language.

    Another way of putting it is: An illiterate person can press a button on a touchscreen to order a hamburger, because either there is a symbol of a hamburger, or, they were taught to recognize the shape of the word “hamburger”. But, they might not actually know what the price actually means or, they may mistakenly order a plane ticket to Bamberg, Germany, because the words look alike. If they have a computer and an error dialog box pops up, will they know how to figure out how to fix it? Will they install “anti-virus” software that opens in a popup because it looks similar?

    How about if they want to learn how to write a resume? How will they do that? What about figuring out how to write a mod for Minecraft? Or Enterprise software? These are all things that are dependent on linguistic literacy. Reduction in the general population’s literacy makes people easier marks for cons and significantly reduces their ability to learn new things as well as effectively operate computers for anything but games and scams.

    ETA: I’m far from an expert and would really recommend looking into what LeVar Burton of Reading Rainbow and Star Trek fame is saying about this problem.