It does not. No insurance company does cover nuclear reactors and running the long term storage is not priced in. So, the costs of a potential disaster and of dealing with the leftovers are kicked to whoever encounters that problem at some point.

If I ran a company like that, I could damn sure be cheaper than someone else too.

Oh, that’s cheap, nice. Does that include liability insurance and running costs for the nuclear waste repository for the next few hundred years?

Please make sure what you say is correct before postulating.

https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?c=DE&interval=year

In relevant numbers? Yes. Mostly? No.

That should be a big damper for all national movements that want to leave the EU.

You can’t reason people out of a corner they didn’t reason themselves into.

Dude is shilling Russian gas. Next thing he says is Carbon dioxide is good because plants use it in the photosynthesis.

Does that really make a difference on the bill, are the houses so badly insulated? I always thought that style of building with wooden walls and insulation foam should make heating extremely cheap.

Hm. My bathroom is always 23°C or warmer, no matter the weather. When is colder outside, my heat pump delivers more warm water to the heating circuits. Does heating in the US work differently?

What are the two doing in the image?

Being hawk-ish requires some power to put behind that. I don’t think we have that, anymore.

Yeah, no worries, we’re actively electing nazis again in september. On state level for now, country wide in 2029 and that should fix things, it definitely did the last time, the economy worked lovely in the 1950s and 1960s. There was a little thing in between, but… propably not important.

Lets think about that.

• The rivers flow rate is the product of its cross section times the flow speed.
• The flow rate is also the sum of all the runoff and streams that end in the river above any given point.

So, if what you assume were true, the flow speed would sink. The ingress flow rate would not reduce though, why should it, so the only way to keep the ratio between flow speed and cross section, aka the flow rate constant would be to increase the cross section area. So, the water level would have to rise, no other way to achive that. So the question is: “Will the river in its entire length raise its level when we put these turbines in at any point?” - that would be a great way to get hundres kilometers of deeper shipping lanes for free, but no, of course it won’t.

Those are not really handling the protocol. The phone still has to show a cert signed by some Google CA and iirc those are pretty shortlived and regularly refreshed by the android Auto app.

Thick framed glasses are just dead now.

“There are no stupid questions, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots.”

We have no “sick days”. You’re sick, you get paid. After six weeks in a row, health insurance takes over and you still get 70% of your usual wage.

Do you continue to get paid when you’re sick? If no, the company is less likely to care about why they stop paying you until you show up again.

The linked video by Real Engineering does some back of the napkin math and yeah… the numbers are so off anything remotely feasible, it’s hilarious.

You sir, might personally profit a lot from going out and touching some grass, and I mean actual, on the ground, growing grass. You know. Reality. Real things. Real, little things that other people deal with. Then, other, actual people. Less internet. A lot less of it, I’d say.

They came out on top of 2008/09 as well.

Oh they see it coming as well, but unlike us, they have the levers and means to come out on top of it.