Nobody is forcing you to read anyone’s comments on Facebook.

If they’re disturbing you from working, that’s an issue independent from the message they’re expressing, so freedom of expression does not apply.

They do not curate the content that’s posted there. Just because someone wrote something on Facebook does not mean Facebook endorses their opinion, just like sending someone an e-mail does not mean that your e-mail host endorses whatever you sent.

If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. —Noam Chomsky

No, that’s not what “censorship” means.

You have it backward. Censorship is what creates echo chambers.

I’m looking forward to whenever someone decides that your beliefs are “hate speech” and suddenly you’ll be the one supporting free speech.

A social site doesn’t publish anything, it’s just a medium for users to communicate.

A social media site is not a publisher.

Moderator groups that users can choose between.

So preventing underage people from seeing NSFW content is oppression?

Copyright is bad, but if it exists, it should apply equally to everyone, not just megacorporations.

Make two Reddit accounts, one saying “I love trans people” and one saying “I hate trans people”. I bet the latter will get banned first.

How does writing a comment on Facebook negatively affect anyone’s rights?

Also:

Right arm raised up and right, fingers extended

My instance doesn’t seem to have any censorship as far as I can tell, but despite what terminally online people would expect, it’s not overrun by Nazis.

„Šmoulové“ in Czech

Why couldn’t you?

Your calculation is assuming that the input images are statistically independent, which is certainly not the case (otherwise the model would be useless for generating new images)

By this logic, you can copy a copyrighted imege as long as you decrease the resolution, because the new image does not contain all the information in the original one.