• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    13 years ago

    I don’t get how people think this VC funding is a good thing. Matrix like Discord is run by a highly over VC funded for-profit company and both will turn on their users for profit extraction sooner or later.

    XMPP and IRC are the real alternatives. Matrix is the the uber of IRC :(

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      83 years ago

      It’s worth keeping an eye out for, but as long as the profit or value extraction is just making Matrix a communication tool they can use without licensing fees associated with other team communication tools, that’s fine. It’s not like the capital behind Linux development has driven Linux in any way towards extracting money or value from end users.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yes lets see, but VC funding is significantly different then corporate sponsoring as in the case of the Linux Kernel. VC funding basically means the company has to bring in extremely high returns of investment (500% or more) or go bust trying to reach that.

        • Bilb!
          link
          fedilink
          23 years ago

          This is true, if it’s truly a VC investment rather than simply an investment with an expectation of bringing a technology up to usable standards then it’s a little concerning. I admit, I have no idea if that is the case.

          • poVoq
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            AFAIK the current 30 million mostly come from a medium tier investment company that probably itself isn’t interested in profit extraction from users yet, but will rather look into making New Vector look pretty for acquisition of a large tech-company like Microsoft or some sort of IPO on the stock market.

            • Bilb!
              link
              fedilink
              23 years ago

              Seems like a dubious proposition to me, though I’m far from an expert in that regard. Hopefully they use the money to pay developers to make rapid improvements and the commercial ambitions of the firm don’t pan out. ;)

              • poVoq
                link
                fedilink
                23 years ago

                I think it is quite realistic to expect a buy-out from a bigger European tech company (SAP? German Telekom?) that thinks it can siphon off more government contracts and pretend to catch up to the US tech giants in front of their shareholders. And as shitty as that probably sounds, this is likely still among the “best” possible outcomes. The open-source community can only lose in this setup and are fools for cheering about this money injection.

    • @freely@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      73 years ago

      I don’t really see how much bad could come of it. Maybe they start trying to hamfist ToS or license changes into the code, but then it’ll be forked.

      At worst they do some crazy data harvesting on the main instance, causing an exodus of users onto either self-hosted or other public instances.

    • @lemm1ngs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      Money is good as a function of our economy, but the issue you point out is concerning. It really depends on the conditions attached to the funding, like will it compromise the project somehow. The funding is just as likely to be from an intelligence agencies VC arm to alter the code for their benefit. I have seen mentions that Matrix is being used now in things that “can’t” be mentioned. Ideally open source should be able to circumvent such interference but not easily I think.