We build Signal in the open, with publicly available source code for our applications and servers. To keep Signal a free global communication service without spam, we must depart from our totally-open posture and develop one piece of the server in private: a system for detecting and disrupting spam campaigns. Unlike encryption protocols, which are designed to be provably secure even if everyone knows how they work, spam detection is an ongoing chore for which there is no concrete resolution and for which transparency is a major disadvantage.
I suggest locking the thread, red pilled people spreading their based opinion here which is not helpful at all.
Facts are
Personal comment If someone gives me 50 Mio. in funding I wont let people down like this. What Signal team does here is more than pathetic, they spit in everyones face taking the money and they expect us to swollow the pill.
Give me the money I do better and I hang myself if I let someone down like Signal team did - you can quote me on this. No I am not suicidal it just expresses how most people think about the story and how they betrayed their own community.
Look, getting up in arms over Signal is not doing much. Why? Because everyone’s threat model is not the same. Not everyone is wanting 100% anonymity when using Signal. Signal is a replacement for WhatsApp, not XMPP or Matrix or Retroshare.
Sit back for 10 minutes and think over again. I understand pretty well what you are trying to convey, and it is problematic in a similar way the points you are raising against others’ arguments.
Please quote whoever attacked you personally, and I am going to take action against it. Harassment is not welcome on Lemmy. We all want a civil platform here.
I’m pretty sure this user is talking about me after I disagreed with him multiple times in this discussion. Feel free to review the discussion and let me know if any of my statements is harassing this user in any way.
It is off-topic and smear campaign against me, my work that is all. How is that relevant to topic. It s not.
Here goes for both of you, @CHEFKOCH@lemmy.ml and @PandaCoderPL@lemmy.ml, please do not fight it out here publicly. If you want to pick a fight, go do it in DMs or a realtime chat platform like Matrix or XMPP.
All I see is a petty argument between you two, and getting riled up over what is typical privacy community drama. Do not make yourself another GrapheneOS vs CopperheadOS, it makes both look like fools.
@CHEFKOCH@lemmy.ml publicly accused me of harassing him so I felt it will be good to defend myself also publicly.
Of course that would be a better option but I didn’t want to look like I’m avoiding his baseless accusations. If someone is calling me out publicly, they can be sure I will answer publicly as well.
I was only replying to that user and for me, the argument related to his past activity is over. Hopefully he will understand that and will also stop replying to me about that issue.
I appreciate that your reaction but I hope you will try to understand my point of view as well. Thank you in advance.
First useful comment here. Thanks.
I suggest locking this thread, cleaning it. My Guild is here. People with objective and constructive criticism are welcome.
I already predict that this will happen and requested multiple times to lock this because this is all off-topic and a vendetta against my in person, nothing more. The user simply wanted to smuggle his argument inside wrapped up Signal posts to make me look like a fool.
The moment I see another spark that is about to become a housefire in this thread, I will lock it. I doubt anything will happen now.
Disagreeing with your statements is not smear campaign against you.
Claiming something without been involved, checking the facts and abusing it on a high traffic website is a smear campaign, as per definition.
It makes it so or so not better because it is still off-topic.
The problem is that from what I know those facts are not made up, I’m not abusing this and Lemmy is not really high traffic website. If my goal would be to spread this information about you, then I would definitely use any other website but I’m only using those facts as part of our conversation so that’s completely different situation.
If it’s offtopic then just end this part of our discussion at this point. In future, if you don’t want people to remind you of your past then simply change your username or just don’t do anything bad.
You accuse someone which you never tried to contact before, come with a link which had to be closed b an GitHub staff due to misinformation and call this fact. According to you, earth must be flat because it is also written somewhere on the internet.
I urge you to stop spreading misinformation regarding my person because you want to discredit me to make your stuff look better. You failed here miserably. Please stay on the topic, Lemmy is FOSS community. Signal is not anymore FOSS which was the reason it got attention in the first place.
We have sufficient alternatives, they are mentioned here by fine people of Lemmy. This is why Signal is for FOSS enthusiasts dead, and this statement is not wrong.
No, you didn’t.
The issue is still open and last comment was written two weeks ago so either you live in some different reality or your so-called evidence is made up.
The only member who got warned and then permanently banned in that situation was you. Your GitHub account is still banned since 2018. Now try to convince me and others that this happened because GitHub stuff was wrong and they don’t know their own ToS.
Please quote the part of GitHub those which states that the users have to contact you in any way before exposing you and showing evidence against you.
Can you show me any proof that anyone related to arkenfox is chasing you over multiple platforms and that I’m doing the same?
You were the one spreading misinformation, not facts, so I reminded people about who you are so they can better understand why are you behaving that way and that they shouldn’t worry about you attacking them if they disagree with you.
By writing really long post, spreading misinformations and users who exposed you and claiming that amount of knowledge is measured by number of your repositories.
You should better educate yourself if you think that plagiarizing other’s work is nothing bad.
And that’s what you should do few years ago instead of writing long and meaningless post.
You have no way to know that.
The GitHub issue is still open and even active. The only user who got punished in this situation was you.
No, because it was proven that earth is not flat. You still didn’t prove that you didn’t plagiarize other’s work.
You are the one trying to accuse me of harassment only because I gave you the link to facts about yourself.
It doesn’t matter. If you are using Lemmy, it doesn’t mean you can’t use messenger that was FOSS for most of the times.
You are wrong again. Signal is dead but only for you, just one tiny person that is trying to prove that he did nothing bad.
I already made my point.
I can take criticism, it was just to make my point how useless the discussion here has become.
I request again here in public to lock the topic because the bias on this is very strong and people do not let it go even if you prove them wrong.
Strongly disagree. As someone who has lots of friends and comrades using Signal on a daily basis, the fact that you have to tie it to a phone is (rightfully) perceived by anarchists as a threat against us.
If you are using Signal for anonymity, then you need to learn how to pick the correct tools for the correct job. You go to XMPP or Matrix or Retroshare or some chat over I2P for that, not Signal.
The only thing you can achieve properly, for the most part, is pseudonymity, and not anonymity over Signal, because your SIM is being tracked, unless you have a working VoIP provider that cannot be traced back to you.
I agree, but that doesn’t mean everyone is on the same boat. Matrix/XMPP clients still don’t have as good UX as Signal.
You can choose beautiful UX or you can choose a workable UX plus features you need. Element UI looks fine to me, as does blabber.im.
You are basically out of arguments, you know that you were wrong so now you are suggesting locking the thread to avoid further discussion. You posted this shortly after replying to me so I wouldn’t have chance to reply back. Having last message in the discussion doesn’t mean you are right though.
Explain this: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server Signal is mostly open source, only mechanisms related to blocking spam are closed source.
It’s not a big deal for some people because everyone has different threat model. Some people are using Signal with their family and friends who already have their phone number anyway.
Could you link to at least one source that proves it?
You are using the same argument twice to make your message longer so it looks smarter? Above you can see link to source code of Signal server.
You were the one who was constantly saying that code that is running on the server can be verified if you have access to the server. Of course it can, but how is it related to Signal?
You don’t even have to. Also this kind of behavior is really childish: “I could do that but I will not do it”. If you are not going to do it then why did you even mention that.
Did you give them the money? Signal got funding so they can do whatever they want with it. People have different needs and expectations so it’s not really possible to create perfect messenger that would make everyone happy.
I disagree with that statement. Signal is constantly being updated, new features are being added, bugs are getting fixed, you are the only one who is complaining that Signal team got the money but they are not doing what you want them to do with it. Luckily for you, Signal is open source so you can fork it and make your own messenger that will look just like you want it.
Can you do it without plagiarizing other’s work though?
I am not out of arguments, I explained multiple times that your audit argument does not hold because in reality no one audits server code. You refuse to accept it and continue your nonsense.
The app as well as the server code can be closed sourced afterwards, which happened now partially. If more and more crypto stuff gets added then what will happen next, they close that too.
Some people also use XMPP with their family, according to your previous logic, why abandon XMPP.
Here.
Because you mentioned it 3 times now, you quote everything to make a mess now to make it look like that what you say is true, which is not. Please provide evidence that normal people audit source code of the app or the server code, there is none.
It can if you run your own, you talk about decentralization, so there you have it.
You act childish, you come with arguments written by clowns. How is that related to Signal, harassment is not wanted here on Lemmy.
If the govt. funds project, then everyone indirectly gave the money. A messenger claims to be private and then wants your phone number, well that alone is a no go. You can simply use a QR-Code to add new contacts.
The server code was not updated for over one year, this is not constantly, in the meantime features did break. Luckily your argument about open source does not hold because can you audit it, no. So there you have it. And how does open source help if something is outdated or if the server code is changed, it does not help at all.
I can and I debunked the wrong accusation here, which you refuse to read in full, as you admitted here.
How is that relevant to OP, you try to discredit me or my work based on some so called-findings from people who copy everything out of Bugzilla and other sources. What you do here is harassment and proves my point exactly. No arguments, coming with years old stuff from GitHub that violates GitHub Tos by abusing issue tickets for harassment, congrats.
Where did I even mention that auditing code of the server would change anything? I was only saying that you can’t verify what is running on the server so it doesn’t really matter if Signal makes that code open source or not.
Now I can agree because you added that code of the server is partially closed.
Who said anything about abandoning XMPP? I already said that people are free to use whatever they want because everyone has different threat model. Of course there are projects that I will recommend or not but nobody is forced to listen to my opinions.
Thank you for the link, I will definitely check it out later.
Ans you still refuse to understand it.
I already said that I’m using quotes to make my reply more readable and less confusing, especially in case of longer statements. Quotes doesn’t make anything look more true, it’s just personal preference and my style of replying to others.
How do you know there is none? Do you know what every single person on the planet is doing right now? I highly doubt it.
Decentralization is not related to Signal either because AFAIK all servers are owned by one company.
Let the moderators decide if this is harassment.
Privacy is not 0 or 1. Like I said before, people have different threat models so for some people will not care about using their own phone number for Signal, when others will not use Signal or even any mobile device at all.
I said that Signal was constantly being updated, not the code of the server.
I already explained why I refused to read your explanation in full:
Saying that you were plagiarizing work is not harassment but warning for other users who will be interacting with you in any way in future.
No one audits code, this is the point, I have even proven that with the OpenSSL Heartbleed argumentation. Open source does not help at all here, you can also reverse closed source stuff. This is what you do not understand. You can change stuff on the server and it will break stuff for your clients, a short test if you add feature x into the app, then check if the current server accepts it or not. Yes, this is a small test everyone can do.
And how long until they close everything. The betrayed their community. I said, give me the money, I do better, hiring people or do it yourself with 50 Mio is easily archived.
You said according to my logic. The normal user does not even know what threat model is.
Yes, read it and really read everything and not only the headers like you did with my link.
This is more readable, oh my god. Really. Your logic and weak arguments are beyond cringe.
Nope, Signal uses AWS, Google and Azure. There are fallback servers etc.
Yup, this thread gets closed anyway and maybe ends up that we both get banned because spam.
No one said nor implied it. You mention thread model now 3 times, well I assume you do not even know what it is. Your aggressive - I wanna be right here - argument does not hold. You defend a system which turned on their users and make arguments up to make it look less shocking than it is, people trusted Signal but only if it is FOSS. That changed, and there is no arguing here.
This is from basically the headers and not the full thing. Again you do not read links in full, you have no credibility nor reputation at all. Why shall someone believes a random account created 2 months ago which aggressively defends Signal because he wants to be right, failing the point that this OP is about that parts are closed source now.
No, I provided sufficient evidence that the arkenfox people are liar and hypocrites. This is a fact.
There is no proof for this claim, I even explained it in detail. Again, using other statements from the internet makes you look like am amateur. Or do you believe earth is flat because it is written down.