• huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I guess this would work, but why not make a specific law? Copyright is meant for creative acts. Humans are created, in an act, but, never mind.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The answer seems obvious. This is simply a gift to famous people, who will be able to demand licensing fees without having to do any additional work. Just neo-feudalism.

      The pitch makes as much sense as trying to sell ordinary copyright as a way to stop people forging documents.