The speed and size doesn’t matter if the odds of them hitting something is essentially zero.
No these drunk tourists aren’t getting hit by cars because the infrastructure and roads are properly designed with pedestrians and bicyclists as top priority.
If you manage to get hit by a car you didn’t necessarily fuck up, lots of cities like in the US are extremely dangerous to walk because cars are passing really close to pedestrians at high speeds.
It all comes down to road design and infrastructure.
You say I ignored your question, you ignored mine.
You don’t know what good infrastructure looks like.
Prove me wrong, What city have you lived in with good infrastructure?
not how it works, you finding it hard to come up with answers to questions regarding your point does not mean i am missing it.
cities i have lived in are none of your business.
why do you think that chance of being hit by a bus are “essentially zero”? and why is it different from the cars in the same city on the same roads, aka THE SAME INFRASTRUCTURE - no matter how good or bad?
if drunken tourists aren’t getting hit by a car because of good infrastructure, why is there a need to lower their speed and why does the same need does not apply to buses?
Your completely missing my point.
The speed and size doesn’t matter if the odds of them hitting something is essentially zero.
No these drunk tourists aren’t getting hit by cars because the infrastructure and roads are properly designed with pedestrians and bicyclists as top priority.
If you manage to get hit by a car you didn’t necessarily fuck up, lots of cities like in the US are extremely dangerous to walk because cars are passing really close to pedestrians at high speeds.
It all comes down to road design and infrastructure.
You say I ignored your question, you ignored mine.
You don’t know what good infrastructure looks like. Prove me wrong, What city have you lived in with good infrastructure?
not how it works, you finding it hard to come up with answers to questions regarding your point does not mean i am missing it.
cities i have lived in are none of your business.
why do you think that chance of being hit by a bus are “essentially zero”? and why is it different from the cars in the same city on the same roads, aka THE SAME INFRASTRUCTURE - no matter how good or bad?
if drunken tourists aren’t getting hit by a car because of good infrastructure, why is there a need to lower their speed and why does the same need does not apply to buses?