Cars used to be entirely mechanical objects. With hard work and expertise, basically any old vehicle could be restored and operated: On YouTube, you can watch a man drive a 1931 Alvis to McDonaldâs. But the car itself was stuck in time. If the automaker added a feature to the following yearâs model, you just didnât get it. Things have changed. My Model 3 has few dials or buttons; nearly every feature is routed through the giant central touch screen. Itâs not just Tesla: Many new carsâand especially electric carsâare now stuffed with software, receiving over-the-air updates to fix bugs, tweak performance, or add new functionality.
In other words, your car is a lot like an iPhone (so much so that in the auto industry, describing EVs as âsmartphones on wheelsâ has become a go-to clichĂ©.) This has plenty of advantagesâthe improved navigation, the fart noisesâbut it also means that your car may become worse because the software is outdated, not because the parts break. Even top-of-the-line phones are destined to become obsoleteâstill able to perform the basic functions like phone calls and texts, but stuck with an old operating system and failing apps. The same struggle is now coming for cars.
Software-dependent cars are still new enough that itâs unclear how they will age. âItâs becoming the ethos of the industry that everyoneâs promising a continually evolving car, and we donât yet know how theyâre going to pull that off,â Sean Tucker, a senior editor at Kelley Blue Book, told me. âCars last longer than technology does.â The problem with cars as smartphones on wheels is that these two machines live and die on very different timescales. Many Americans trade in their phone every year and less than 30 percent keep an iPhone for longer than three years, but the average car on the road is nearly 13 years old. (Tesla didnât respond to a request for comment about how its cars age.)



Oh yeah, I do remember looking at those too, but iirc they were all still at a significant range disadvantage compared to the model 3. Dunno about now, though.
The all had 200-250 mile ranges. Less than 320, but fine for most folks. Now there are so many good EV options, the only downside is cost nowadays. We need a good, compact, inexpensive EV with decent charging speeds. The Bolt almost does that, bit the charging speeds are real slow
The Slate seems like itâs almost there, but the range still kinda sucks. Telo looks promising too, but it has the same vaporware scent about it as the Aptera so who knows if itâll ever happen.
I feel like the Telo has more bonafides than the Aptera. At least one of the founders has shipped a car in the past (original Tesla Roadster). Slate has Amazon backing, so will probably happen, but also AmazonâŠ
Oh shit, I didnât know that about Telo. That gives me a little more hope about it, though it still doesnât have the same draw to me as the Slate does, Amazon involvement notwithstanding. Honestly, with how simple the Slate is, Iâm curious how Amazon would even exert the same control over their vehicles as Tesla does (but not curious enough to want to find out, of course).
Yeah, one of the founders is from OG Tesla. Still not putting a deposit, but makes me more optimistic.