Lemmy claims decentralization, but once you join a community on one instance youāre still subject to that instanceās rules and moderators. Being banned from c/community@instance still means you canāt post there unless you make a new account elsewhere. That isnāt real decentralization, itās just fragmentation where every instance ends up replicating the same centralized moderation power in a different place. Federated instances donāt stop this, they just scatter the same problem across multiple servers. If the goal is escaping centralized control, the reality is you still get banned, silenced, or cut off the same way, the only āfreedomā is signing up somewhere else. Thatās not decentralization in practice, itās decentralization in name only.
The reality is that an instance or community with rules that are too strict simply dies or never becomes popular in the first place since anyone can re-create a community on another server. People have the freedom to choose the ābestā instance or even hang out on the strict one if they so desire.
Nah I think it works well. If an instance sucks, itās easy enough to use a similar community on a different instance, people will move. If an instance dies, itās easy enough to move the community to a different instance. Weāve seen it happen already. Way better than Reddit.
I donāt think you understand federation. Its like bars. with reddit you only have bars owned by one place. here you have all sorts of independent one. if you donāt fit in at community@instance for whatever reason, maybe the mods are powertripping. Well you can go to community@otherinstance and talk on the subject. Just like if the bouncers at some place wonāt let you in you can find one that is more chill. Hey man sometimes just someone who hangs out at a place turns you off. Its great to have options.
That just causes fragmentation, in Reddit all the community is in a single place, thatās what made it popular otherwise we could go back to using forums. Each person chooses a different one and then we end up with dozens of barely active forums.
well us just having a alternative keeps it being in one place and then there are other things like slashdot or any other competitors. piefed does a good job of grouping things (kinda comics seems to be split in at least two topics). Personally I donāt want to be in one place with everyone on the planet as I donāt like many people. I want a place with somewhat like minded folks just like I would with a club or bar or whatever.
go back to using forums.
You can subscribe to communities on different instances. I click All or Subscribed I see stuff that isnāt just in my instance.
Thatās kind of the opposite of fragmentation. Personally, I enjoy seeing which instance each person is from.
dozens of barely active forums.
well, lemmy itself is pretty niche. Yea I get that itās frustrating when thereās a niche community with basically zero activity ⦠I feel like thatās just because lemmy itself is relatively small.
I dunno, this screams of āI want to be an asshole with no way for anyone to stop me.ā
Describe what you think decentralization is in practice.
Moderation is good. Decentralization isnāt the absence of moderation.
Just go to communities where you agree with the rules.
I donāt think Lemmy ever claimed theyāre decentralised, because it has a specific meaning that sets itself apart from being federated, and Lemmy certainly isnāt decentralised.
The whole freedom of federation comes from the fact that if you donāt like something, youāre free to set up your own stuff and do it there. In practice, it doesnāt work that well as advertised especially for something like Lemmy, which creates an additional layer of isolation (communities) within itself, but it requires a large group of people in a single community to work. I think Lemmy needs a way to 'āmergeā communities across instance.
decentralization doesnāt have a particularly specific meaning. Federation absolutely qualifies for having a certain degree of it. You can be more or less decentralized ranging from completely monolithic to fully p2p. Then there are related properties like the ability to migrate or anonymity.
Some instances are themed, some are generalist. Because multiple communities can exist around the same topic/theme, the user based ultimately ends up in a community hosted on an instance that fits their needs, because if it didnāt, they would simply move elsewhere.
Which ultimately means that if you get instance banned from an instance that hosts a community you want to use, thereās a good chance you werenāt going to last long in that community anywayā¦
Your freedom is in the (theoretical) ability run your own instance and communities on it if you disagree with or have been banned from other instances. And your instance can federate with whomever will allow it.
Communities also want freedom ā to be organized and run the way they want to be, and to be free from being hijacked or shit on uncontrollably by randos, bad actors, or even (defined by themselves) undesirables.
Itās not perfect. But you sometimes have to consider a bigger picture than just your personal freedom, to make things a free as practically possible.
deleted by creator
I like themed instances and would enjoy them more if the All feed were personalized instead of the same for everyone. They are nice for browsing different content, sort of like a multireddit but choosing an instance that fits you best isnāt possible, you would need to analyze your votes compared to other usersā votes on each instance. Also I may not like tomorrow a topic I like today so choosing an instance based on a theme makes no sense to me.
I like themed instances and would enjoy them more if the All feed were personalized instead of the same for everyone.
Thatās what your subscribed feed is forā¦
But choosing an instance that fits you best isnāt possible
It doesnāt need to be the best fitting instance possible. It just needs to be an instance that lets you use and interact with the fediverse in a way that works with you. Thatās why a lot of people use generalist instances. Theyāre no ones ābest fitā, but they are also less likely to be bad fits for folkā¦










