Today, 21 January 2026, the European Commission published its long-awaited proposal for a Digital Networks Act (DNA). Framed as a technical modernisation of Europe’s telecom rules, the proposal marks a decisive shift away from core principles that have safeguarded an open and neutral internet for almost a decade.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Age checks identify every account and every ip. Which is the point. Identified in a way that lower level government, business dickheads, hacker groups, and the tech companies running it along with other organized groups like intelligence agencies, can get their hands on the data if they try.

    Chatcontrol was also not “dead” last I heard, they redesigned it for the umpteenth time, calling it voluntary, which it wasn’t I forget the tortured legal construction to allow them to call it “voluntary.”

    The entire world is implementing stuff like this right now, all trying to implement new “ai” technology to surveil their populations.

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      On what data? All age verification does is attest that an IP is over a certain age; the European solution collects no information other than the boolean “Is user over <age>?”, the expiry date, and the issuing authority. I don’t know what you can do with data simply saying that the user isn’t browsing the internet “illegally”, since with age gating every user on the Internet is over that age. In our present time of dynamic/private IPs, the operator behind the IP (and consequently their age) changes constantly anyways, meaning that little data is constantly invalidated.

      Chat Control is “dormant”. It’s been amended, re-proposed, and then put back on the backburner for umpteenth times, including this time. It’s definitely a threat, I agree, but nothing about it has become more eager in 2025.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Forcing everyone to identify themselves with ID and or likeness, to private companies, ID’s every account and IP, and everything done under that recorded, and AI sorting it all. Do you really not know what is going on here? You think the information won’t be held by anyone?

        Intelligence already has that information too to a degree. This would be accessible to lower level government, like political appointees, to silicon valley doing the verification, to the police, you name it, no matter what they tell you.

        You do realize some of the verification is sending video of you, and or sending in ID. If you don’t see a problem with that, I could not help but think your fear center is impaired somehow.