• MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s a chart that I’ve found really helpful. Predictably, it’s drawn some criticism, but in my experience, it’s been very accurate.

    • EnjoiNakMuay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except they daily mail is well known as a heavily right leaning paper for years. So I wouldn’t take that images accuracy to heart

  • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Economist. Despite the insufferable name, it’s really quite good. It’s one of the only traditional publications that I actively pay for and read weekly.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. Outside of if their Fuck Russia coverage (which isn’t unearned) or the viewpoint of a noble wanting to actually understand what is going on with the masses, it is pretty good.

  • pinwurm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://ground.news/ is a pretty good resource. It’s a news aggregate that also reveals the source’s/writer’s political biases as a percentage of left or right. Also it’s factuality versus editorialization, and who owns the outlet.

    Definitely one of the better ones out there.

  • shua_too@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get a weekly email from Ground.News and it’s been pretty interesting to see the distribution of sources covering various stories. I’ve never personally mused on the leanings of various sources but it passes the eye test I think, and it helps give a good aggregation of perspectives on a story.

  • richneptune@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    BBC News. They do a fairly good job of being impartial since both main party voters here in the UK hate it and accuse it of being biased to the opposition!

  • Pumpkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really read news in English anymore, but when I did, I subscribed to the economist. I found most other news sites were too biased and ignored most of the world.

  • elltee@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ground.news They label bias both left, right, ans center. Blindspots, which are things that are only bring shown to one side of the political spectrum. Not sure how effective they are outside the US, tho.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m fortunate to live in an area with good local independent news sources like Berkeleyside.

    National & international are a big mess. Better to look at lots of different sources. If the Wall Street Journal, Al-Jazeera, and The Grauniad all talk about an event, it probably happened.