WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDo you consider AI art “OC” ?message-squaremessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down19
arrow-up184arrow-down1message-squareDo you consider AI art “OC” ?WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square155fedilink
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoBecause humans can have new ideas.
minus-squareaname@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThose are not new ideas. Those are based on persons experiences up to that point. There is nothing magical in human brain that we cannot eventually implement in AI.
minus-squareredballooon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoHow new is a new idea, if it must be formulated in an existing language?
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoLanguage is itself invented by humans.
minus-squareredballooon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoNot by me though, or you. Can’t have new ideas 😞
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years ago“Humans can have new ideas” isn’t “humans only have new ideas”.
minus-squareatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThose ‘new’ ideas can be inputted as a prompt into an AI image generator. Would the output of that satisfy your criteria for OC?
Because humans can have new ideas.
Those are not new ideas. Those are based on persons experiences up to that point. There is nothing magical in human brain that we cannot eventually implement in AI.
How new is a new idea, if it must be formulated in an existing language?
Language is itself invented by humans.
Not by me though, or you. Can’t have new ideas 😞
“Humans can have new ideas” isn’t “humans only have new ideas”.
Those ‘new’ ideas can be inputted as a prompt into an AI image generator. Would the output of that satisfy your criteria for OC?