• FluffyPotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the options are Stalin or capitalism, then capitalism would be a clear winner even if it’s shit because Stalin and his ideology still has the 2 issues from the first panel but on top of that he would execute anyone with an actual good system.

  • yiliu@informis.land
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Okay, let’s say we were going to change some things…what did you have in mind?”

    “I was thinking maybe you should give me lots of shit for free.”

      • yiliu@informis.land
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As bad as it is in many ways, it’s better for the environment. There’s less actual consumption.

        There’s a certain strain of Leftism that sees that people are taking the climate crisis seriously, so they’re like “Oh shit, it’s my chance to make good! If you care about the environment, you gotta give me shit! Capitalism is bad for the environment, and the opposite of capitalism is money in my pocket, let’s get going!”

        It’s purely self-serving.

    • skulblaka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was thinking maybe we should stop giving the disgustingly rich lots of shit for free. But that’s just me. If some of that free shit makes it into the hands of people that can use it, all the better.

      • yiliu@informis.land
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What free shit? You mean, we should stop letting them keep so much of their own shit? I mean, I’m okay with that, but it’s got basically nothing to do with the presented problems. More people using more shit is not going to cool the globe.

  • Miczech@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is naive. Having grown up in a post communist country I know better than to fall for empty propaganda. You don’t know what you’re asking for calling out on communism as your saving grace. Communism didn’t allow for any valie creation and the system was too rigid to respond to people’s needs as economy was preplanned in 5 year intervals. Chronic shortages. Full employment was required by law but quality of life remained stagnant. Capitalism has its pitfalls too. The best outcome lays somewhere in the middle of the two