The avalanche has just began.

    • Rengoku@lemm.ee
      162·
      1 year ago

      No man dont ruin Linux rabid users from bitching about Windows.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.worldEnglish
      75·
      1 year ago

      But but but that’s not as fun as hearing a bunch of Linux users bitch about shit they heard once maybe.

      Really though this website seems to have more misinformation and just general stupidity than even reddit.

    • rkk@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I simply just hate windows and dont care if its true or not. they sell you without subscription.

  • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1576·
    1 year ago

    if this is true I might actually stop being lazy and mess with Linux for my personal systems

      • My Password Is 1234@lemmy.world
        378·
        1 year ago

        There is no “us” or “them”. If Microsoft will maintain its streak of spoiling everything they touch, everyone will switch to Linux sooner or later 😉

        • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
          433·
          1 year ago

          Now, for an actual sane take, unless we do the actual marketing work in order to gather interest from people, no, not even close to everyone will switch to Linux, specially considering Microsoft has literal millions of dollars to spend in marketing and will likely spin this in a way that non-techy people specially will buy in due to not knowing any choice.

          This is a PSA begging people to contribute to their favorite distros not (only) with code but with marketing. Social media posts, videos, word of mouth recommendations, advocacy, events, etc. If your distro doesn’t have a marketing team, create one, as most projects should already have done two decades ago. If your distro has one (like we do in Fedora), join it. There’ll likely be something you can help with.

        • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
          121·
          1 year ago

          That’s true. We’re just getting the window managers and drivers ready for everyone who will follow us.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
          7·
          1 year ago

          This is extreme copium, sorry to say. You have no idea how much shit the average person will eat to prevent having to learn something new. For someone who has never manually installed an OS before, even Windows, the idea of doing that with something like Linux and potentially deleting their existing OS is genuinely frightening. Never underestimate the fact that people will pay through the nose to ensure they don’t have to contend with the unknown.

          • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
            1·
            1 year ago

            Realistically, the year of the Linux desktop will come when Windows 12 enables WSL by default.
            Or when desktop PCs die out and Android devices take over the laptop market.

    • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
      371·
      1 year ago

      https://www.windowslatest.com/2023/10/16/no-windows-12-is-a-free-upgrade-and-wont-require-a-subscription/

      As it turns out, the rumours discussed by some outlets are based on the “IoT Enterprise Subscription” of Windows 11, not Windows vNext. For those unaware, Windows 24H2 or Windows vNext is what Windows 12 is being called publicly. As you can see in the above screenshots, the “subscription” code strings found in the preview builds are associated with a new Enterprise version of Windows 11 loT and have nothing to do with Windows 12 or future versions of the OS.

      I’m not saying to use it or to not switch to linux, but maybe this isn’t that much of a concern.

      I’d be more concerned about

      the next version of Windows will be heavily integrated with AI and cloud capabilities.

      • hactar42@lemmy.world
        10·
        1 year ago

        Windows accounts for 12% of their profits, and I’m willing to bet that the consumer versions are a very small part of that. Most businesses are not buying OEM licenses. They are already using a subscription model for M365 which includes Windows licenses or a standard EA or SA agreement.

        They learned after the Windows Phone that they don’t need to win the client OS battle as long as they can get their other products on the devices. Since then Windows has really focused more on keeping you locked into the Microsoft ecosystem versus keeping locked into Windows itself. Hence why the upgrades have all been free where in the past you would have to repurchase each new edition of Windows.

        Of course I could be completely wrong. They have done some bonkers stuff in the past.

        • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
          9·
          1 year ago

          MS is completely focussed on the Enterprise market now. They need everyone to start using Office 365 early so they’ll keep using it at their job. They don’t really care what OS people run underneath, as long as it can connect to Azure/Entra.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.eeEnglish
          5·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. Also why they’re more and more fucking annoying about OneDrive and O365 subs. I would be extremely surprised at seeing anyone at MS thinking the best way to monetize Windows is to get consumers, who are notoriously more and more tired of subs in general, is to get them to pay a sub fee on the computer they bought. Let’s face it, virtually no one is buying a Windows license, it comes with the machine they buy. If you told people that they have to now pay a fee every month/year to keep using it.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          Couldn’t tell you, I’m on 10 myself because my laptop is old and doesn’t meet the TPM requirement. Which, tbh, is probably best.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      191·
      1 year ago

      I’m an early adopter of Linux (early as in 96-97) but I also run MacOS and Windows so I’m I tell you this from an unbiased point of view. Linux has never been easier to run. My daily driver is a ThinkPad running Pop!_OS Linux and I never have to think about it. I just installed and everything ran.

      I don’t game on my daily driver, I use MacOS for music. At this point Windows is relegated to Adobe Creative Suite, GeForce Now, and the occasional game I can’t run on Linux or GeForce Now.

      • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
        28·
        1 year ago

        I’m not concerned with difficulty just that it’ll take a bit of my time

        yes I’m lazy

        • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.deEnglish
          12·
          1 year ago

          It’s very gradual and fun because it’s new. A lot of you being lazy is also just your safety mechanism kicking in so you don’t dive into every single urge all the time.

          Once you dip your toe, you’ll be at it for a long and good time.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      112·
      1 year ago

      Just start by dual booting one of the “easy” distros and doing stuff that doesn’t require Windows. Eventually you’ll start spending more and more time on it out of comfort, then one day you may realise that you haven’t needed your Windows partition in months, and can skip out on it entirely.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        52·
        1 year ago

        Another alternative is to use FOSS software this is available on Linux and Windows. Get used to the software before the desktop itself. For me, dual booting was a lot of work and wasn’t fun. Maybe live booting for a session or two could be a way to go? I never tried that.

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
      71·
      1 year ago

      I made the switch about a two months ago. I’m using my windows side of my dual boot a hell of a lot less than I thought I would, mostly thanks to steam’s proton.

      Started with zorin, but eventually landed on mint.

      • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        I’m trying to narrow down today’s distro choices, would you mind telling why you switched away from Zorin?

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
          2·
          1 year ago

          The file explorer has some pretty limited options, and not many features. Or at least, it doesn’t have some of the features I like by default.

          It does have zorin connect, which is really nice, but I later found it it is a re-skinned version of KDE connect, so not much is lost by moving to another distro on that front.

          It also seemed to not have as good windows support for certain things. BG3 kept on crashing on me for some unknown reason, with zero error messages to troubleshoot. On mint it worked first try, like it ought to.

          At the end of the day, zorin just isn’t as customizable as I want, whereas mint is.

          • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Thank you! All the advertised built-in compatibility layers seemed too promising, so I’ve been wondering how often it breaks or doesn’t work as well as another distro. Also good to know the connect stuff can be added just by installing KDE. And Dolphin probably a better file manager.

            What’s your preferred file manager, if you don’t mind?

            • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
              2·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I was a bit disappointed with the compatability as well. But luckily it hasn’t effected me too much on mint. So far only two programs I use haven’t been compatible, and even then they aren’t programs I use often.

              What’s your preferred file manager, if you don’t mind?

              Nemo, which is the default for mint.

              Also another reason I switched to mint now that i remember, I wanted to switch to a non-Ubuntu system. The whole point of switching to Linux is to get away from all the corpos getting their hands on your system/data. Unfortunately I only learned how shitty canonical is about it after I unstalled zorin.

              So I currently have mint debian edition installed.

              • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                have mint debian edition installed

                Oh that’s great, you’re exactly the one I need to talk to then, because I’ve been debating why even go with an Ubuntu-based distro at all when it’s based on Debian, and whether or not the Debian version would be a better choice. I’ve been running multiple VMs trying to work out the differences.

                Before I found Debian Mint, I wrote a script for base Debian 12.2 to auto-install wine, steam, and everything else I could think of based on what’s in Linux Mint and Garuda… then discovered Debian Mint and have been wondering if that’s my best choice, because I have no idea what I could be missing in the background on my Debian install, or didn’t set up correctly because I don’t know about it.

                I also noticed that Debian Mint currently uses a newer kernel than Ubuntu Mint… 6.1.0-13 vs 5.15.0. For a newer kernel than that you have to go with the Ubuntu Mint EDGE version (6.2.0) or Arch (6.1.57-lts or 6.5.7-zen).

                —

                Has there been any particular thing you had to do to Debian Mint to make it work better for you?

                • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                  2·
                  1 year ago

                  I will say right off the bat, it sounds like you know a bit more about me, so whatever you decide will probably already be a pretty informed choice.

                  With that said, having used ubuntu occasionally in the past, it doesn’t feel all that different from Debian. They are roughly equally functional, performant, etc.

                  Before I found Debian Mint, I wrote a script for base Debian 12.2 to auto-install

                  I probably should do something similar, because down the line who knows, I might need a full re-install.

                  because I have no idea what I could be missing in the background on my Debian install, or didn’t set up correctly because I don’t know about it.

                  Very anecdotally, like I said there has only been two programs that I haven’t been able to get running that I really want. That’s fusion360 and dungeon draft. Both of which I could pretty easily get running in a VM.

                  Actually now that I think about it, there is a 3d program, and that’s fortnite. But that’s because their management doesn’t give a flying fuck about linux, and so their anti-cheat breaks the game. So no distro will be safe from that.

                  I also noticed that Debian Mint currently uses a newer kernel than Ubuntu Mint

                  Again, it sounds like you are much more informed about it than me. But personally, it hasn’t made a difference for me. I can run my games, the basic internet browsing apps that I like, etc.

                  Has there been any particular thing you had to do to Debian Mint to make it work better for you?

                  The most complex thing that needed set up was getting my drives auto mounted on startup. But debian mint has a pretty straightforward way of setting it up, so it took maybe 5 seconds.

                  Beyond that, it’s just been a small bit of effort setting up the programs I use. Steam, freetube, the prism minecraft launcher, my nvidia drivers, cura, KDE connect, gitkracken, vscode, vlc, etc. It is really low effort honestly, basically the same effort as windows. The software manager/library on debian has been pretty decent to me.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      2·
      1 year ago

      Hard agree. I got a friend trying to get me on linux, and I’ve just been on windows since my first pc.

      But fuck it. I’ll maintain 10 until eol and then whatever Linux supports will be the games I play on steam.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      1·
      1 year ago

      if you don’t use linux, why are you here?, not gate keeçing, but it’s linux memes, i didn’t know other people could find it funny

      • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        I use Linux for work and on some virtual machines personally to mess around sometimes so I know my way around it

      • mateomaui@reddthat.comEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        To be clear, it may be a linux meme, but it’s a post about a possible future with Windows, that may lead some to switch to linux. Windows users being in here, commenting and asking questions, isn’t weird.

      • Frost-752@lemmy.world
        31·
        1 year ago

        Setting up a functional Linux environment can be accomplished within a comparable timeframe to that required for a Windows installation. When opting for user-friendly distributions such as Linux Mint or Ubuntu, the installation process becomes equally accessible for users, presenting no significant challenges when compared to Windows, so while you are entitled to hold this opinion, its factually incorrect.

        • progettarsi@feddit.it
          12·
          1 year ago

          omg linux fanboy when a joke is made (he can’t handle a joke on his only reason to live)

  • corbin@infosec.pub
    1281·
    1 year ago

    This was based on a report that was debunked almost immediately, y’all gotta stop reposting this every day.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.worldEnglish
    513·
    1 year ago

    Everyone here thinking it’s the beginning of the great migration :tm:

    Sorry guys, people are just going to use cracked versions of windows to play games

    • tuxrandom@kbin.social
      221·
      1 year ago

      I suspect most people that only use their Windows computer for general stuff like web browsing, e-mail, multi media, office etc., which is probably the majority by far, will actually fall for the subscription scam.

      • Fubar91@lemmy.world
        71·
        1 year ago

        Yea sadly most people already do via an M365 subscription, if MS decides to tack an OS in with that, doubt many would care enough to make a swap.

        • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
          51·
          1 year ago

          I subscribe to M365 because my kids’ schools all distribute their assignments as Word docs. And they apparently use the most obscure formatting features, so the only way to get them to render and print properly is to use full Office desktop. Not even the web apps show them properly, and LibreOffice / google docs import totally mangle them.

          • burchalka@lemmy.world
            21·
            1 year ago

            Well here at least the school offered an MS Office license to students few years ago, but still, have to pay for the OS…

  • DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social
    331·
    1 year ago

    Guess that’s the day I move over to Linux full time? Just installed mint on one of my work machines to play around on anyways…

  • Doctor xNo@r.nfEnglish
    293·
    1 year ago

    Kudos to Microsoft on keeping to inpirationally show us with every edition it can still get even worse… 😅

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    221·
    1 year ago

    The enshittening continues. Why charge people once when you can charge them repeatedly until they decide enough is enough and leave?

  • NoiseColor@startrek.website
    20·
    1 year ago

    It’s not going to happen for normal users. This is most likely for users that already use some ms subscription, like office.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      11·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, it’s going to be Office 365+Windows in a single package kinda deal.

      Probably with a mostly functioning Windows left if you stop paying, but no access to specific features or Office.

      It’s just a way to get people to pay a few bucks a month extra for the Office 365 package, which in the long term culminates to getting full bank plus then some for Windows, instead of a one time flat fee people will then use for as long as they keep the system.

      Most people I know use the same system/laptop for 3-4 years, some even as long as 6-8 years if the thing doesn’t break down.

      The subscription will likely be setup so that you pay what you’d normally pay for a basic Windows Home (100-130ish) within the first 2 years (say $5 a month) and every year you use the same device longer than that, is just extra gravy for Microsoft.

      But I doubt they’ll drop the simple license. There are to many devices where a subscription wouldn’t work and especially in this day and age, connecting the device to the Internet for any length of time is a big nono for the user/company.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        1·
        1 year ago

        John Riccitelo sees your “they couldn’t possibly be this self-destructive” and raises you a golden parachute.

        To be clear, all the not-so-bad alternatives in this thread are still dealbreakers for me. I do pay for one Office sub, because I need it for work, but I have Windows installs in maybe half a dozen devices and I am NOT paying subscriptions for all of those.

        The real silver lining is that if they do attempt it, and they might, it wouldn’t be the first time a Windows version bombs so bad in favor of its predecessor that they have to roll things back immediately, so we have a pretty clear picture of what that would look like.

        • Laser@feddit.de
          1·
          1 year ago

          it wouldn’t be the first time a Windows version bombs so bad in favor of its predecessor that they have to roll things back immediately, so we have a pretty clear picture of what that would look like.

          The question is, would they care? End user business is a rather small position on their balance sheet I’d guess, it’s rather big support contracts and Azure. Let the individual users complain for a while, they’ve eaten all the shit over the years anyways, they’ll swallow another turd. My current employer justified switching from a Linux based system to Windows which took huge efforts with huge amounts of copium (“they’ve given in and understood our demands!”) yet I bet more issues will arrive when Windows 10 support expires.

          Businesses won’t switch anyways, they never did in huge numbers, and private users are good at complaining and sometimes even holding out on old versions but once storage gets encrypted by ransomware that got in through unpatched security flaws in their no longer supported version of Windows, they’ll pay up anyways.

          But I guess MS just says this idea out loud now so that people can get enraged and then they’ll do something less shitty and everyone will be like “we won! There’s no subscription!”

          • MudMan@kbin.social
            1·
            1 year ago

            They cared the last few times, hence my good news comment.

            MS’s revenue may be whatever it is, but Windows is definitely the crown jewel. There is no way MS would live through it cratering in home use. Not in this weather.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      6·
      1 year ago

      It’s none of the above. Turns out all the references to a subscription in the test builds were to Windows Internet of Things Enterprise subscription edition. Most enterprise things are ran on a subscription type license where you pay for support and rights to use it on an annual basis.

  • jasondj@ttrpg.network
    151·
    1 year ago

    My suspicion is that home installations will still be available at retail or OEM channels.

    The subscription likely applies more to enterprise and possibly Windows 365. Enterprise licensing is a mess which might actually be simplified by a subscription pay-what-you-actually-use model.

    Also it’s be cool to see windows 365 come to consumers as an alternative to a full PC. Would be able to standardize on home thin-client builds, or possibly add it as a feature to the Xbox Platform.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        1·
        1 year ago

        I’m just imagining a not-so-distant future where there’s $200 set-top boxes that can hook up to any HDMI port and have a current-gen cloud console and a nearly fully functional PC. Or cloud laptops that have W365 bundled in as part of a 5G service.

  • Theroux Sonfeir@lemm.ee
    186·
    1 year ago

    This is really just going to make Apple more sales and cripple the PC gaming market.

    Then, Apple will do it and… maybe that will be the year of Linux desktop? 😉