…the next pick to the people who saw you pick the “winner”. Now half of those people see one team, the other half see you pick the other team, and whoever saw you pick the winner thinks you’ve got a 100% accuracy rate over two games. You could do that for a while and then offer to sell your pick for the Superbowl. Starting with a big enough group in the beginning, this might be really lucrative.

But is it legal?

  • sobriquet@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What law would it be breaking?

    Not sure about USA law, but in Australia we would call that “obtaining financial advantage by deception”. Otherwise known as “fraud”.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Would the emails you sent to about a million people be enough to prove intent?

        This is the oldest scam in the book.

        Also, the question is, is it legal. Not whether you are likely to get convicted for it.

        The answer to the questions btw are no, and yes. These types of fraud cases are dead easy to prove and LE secures convictions all the friggin time.

      • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        After your shit gets raided and there’s evidence that you sent out two sets of information to different people… Yeah that’s extremely probable.

        You don’t understand how much of an electronic trail mass mailing would leave. If your mark and a burned mark were on the same email provider, a warrant would uncover this extremely simple scam.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Given someone found it has an official name (Psychic Sports Picks Trick) i’m sure it’s not even close to impossible.

        It should be mentioned though that it sounds like you’d need a massive pool of people for it to actually work.

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, this lemmy post would be exhibit #1 - but even without it it is not at all difficult to establish intent to deceive from just the actions OP is suggesting and nothing more. Sometimes intent is the easy part.