I’m not proposing anything here, I’m curious what you all think of the future.

What is your vision for what you want Linux to be?

I often read about wanting a smooth desktop experience like on MacOS, or having all the hardware and applications supported like Windows, or the convenience of Google products (mail, cloud storage, docs), etc.

A few years ago people were talking about convergence of phone/desktop, i.e. you plug your phone into a big screen and keyboard and it’s now your desktop computer. That’s one vision. ChromeOS has its “everything is in the cloud” vision. Stallman has his vision where no matter what it is, the most important part is that it’s free software.

If you could decide the future of personal computing, what would it be?

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d go a few levels deeper: the kernel development process seems to become more and more dysfunctional. Legacy code hindering innovation, bad people being bottlenecks and this absurdly ancient “send a patch via mail” process.

    Currently, that’s only sand in the gears, but if it gets worse, this could seriously threaten the future.

    • Synthead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m 100% with this. It doesn’t have to be on GitHub, but something like GitHub would really help. It’s easy to create a fork, a PR, and get good reviews on relevant lines of code. With email, not so much. In my opinion, If email really was better, few folks would adopt a VCS like GitHub.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s established and vendor/platform independent.

        I get the idea, but come on, the inventor of git, a distributed VCS is unable to have an actually distributed development?

    • myxi@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “send a patch via mail” process.

      I don’t see a problem with it. I don’t know what tools you use, but the current process certainly isn’t ancient. Even if I use GitHub or something else, I still highly depend on my e-mail to actually know somebody published a patch and if I am supposed to review it. I don’t have to use a GUI coupled with shitty UI decisions. E-mails are very simple in their own way and I don’t find it ancient or bad.