The Israel-Gaza war is “taking away the focus” from the conflict in Ukraine, the country’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has admitted.

He said this was “one of the goals” of Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

And he denied that fighting in Ukraine had reached a stalemate, despite a recent assessment to this effect by the country’s top military general.

Ukraine’s counter-offensive in the south has so far made little headway.

This has prompted fears of war fatigue among Kyiv’s Western allies, with suggestions of growing reluctance in some capitals to continue giving Ukraine advanced weapons and funds.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never thought I’d agree with Zelensky about something related to Israel. Ukraine deserves aid much more than Israel.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      100
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont think Israel needs aid.

      They are responding to an agressor just the same and doing a great job

      • lmaydev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        105
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is they are also the aggressor and have been for decades.

        Hamas and the Israeli government are both fucking awful.

        Feels like a stretch to call carpet bombing civilians a great job.

      • stella@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel absolutely does not need aid.

        If they need more killing equipment, their ruling class can pay for it.

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indiscriminate bombing of innocent civilians, refugee camps, and hospitals, all while refusing to allow even basic aid, is not a “great job”.

        • Neon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          i mean, OP said they’re doing a great job at responding […] the same [way], not that they’re responding in a great way

          so OP is technically correct.

  • gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you think this is bad, just wait until China goes for Taiwan. “Like butter that has been scraped over too much bread.”

    • Historical_General@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      China’s collapse is coming with the rise of other regional powers to counterbalance it. It’s right around the corner. Any day now.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if China is going to collapse any time soon (at some point they will though). At risk of sounding like a conspiracy the world order is changing as America is no longer the sole leading power, trade and infrastructure development are heavily tied to China, and we are too reliant on their cheap goods to go against them.

    • stella@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      China is not going to go for Taiwan.

      Wish you guys would get this fantasy out of your heads.

        • HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          How about you try to prove a positive instead of asking for a source to prove something isn’t going to happen, debatelord

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            China is not going to go for Taiwan.

            source?

            How about you try to prove a positive instead of asking for a source to prove something isn’t going to happen, debatelord

            True, you can’t prove a negative, but at the same time that person made a firm statement, so someone else’s totally in the right to ask for citation to backup what they said.

            They could have supplied quotes from Chinese leaders stating that they were never going to invade, etc.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anyone who asks someone to prove a prediction is categorically an idiot

                Nobody asked for “proof of a prediction”, but to back up their opinions that they are expressing as facts with some actual facts.

          • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            U.S. top millitary advisor mark milly

            We are taking the Chinese military threat very seriously. And that is the reason why we are making more investment in our own defense capabilities. But we have not been focusing on one timeline only. For example, a lot of people are talking about 2025, some people are talking about 2027, some people talk about 2035, and etc. We take all kinds of assessments in a very serious way. And what we want to be prepared for is no matter when the Chinese are going to launch its military attack against Taiwan, we are prepared. But i think that 2027 is the year that we need to be serious about.”

            source: https://www.globalplayer.com/podcasts/episodes/7DrfQik/

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The number of opportunities they have to actually pull it off are so few and far between just from demographics, geography, and meteorology alone, that you can count with two hands the exact number of days between now and when the window will basically close permanently when they could even hypothetically make an attempt at it without cursing their entire invasion force to the bottom of the sea before they even encounter a defensive line.

          Not to mention the rumours that Taiwan has developed a non-nuclear MAD doctrine which would allow them to instantly turn 400,000,000 Chinese citizens into refugees by blowing the 3 gorges dam. A scenario that would require China to turn any deployed forces right around to institute martial law.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Their best bets are;

            a) when Trump is convicted

            b) when Trump wins

            c) when Trump loses

            All three of those provide a large enough window where the US will be too busy to stop them

            While it’s not telling what the US will do afterwards the question is would they rather have a defensive or offensive position

        • stella@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let us know by what time you think China will invade Taiwan.

          When that year comes and the invasion doesn’t happen, either admit you’re wrong or double-down.

          • deft@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            he said source.

            as in, reason us why? china has clearly expressed this desire over Taiwan, why wouldn’t it invade ever at all on a timeline?

            • stella@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              38
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t care what he said.

              How much time needs to pass before you admit you’re wrong?

                • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  these reditgrants are sure pain in the ass.

                  i just asked for proof and they started blabbing. at the same time these hypocrites also dislike religions.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                he said source.

                as in, reason us why? china has clearly expressed this desire over Taiwan, why wouldn’t it invade ever at all on a timeline?

                I don’t care what he said.

                How much time needs to pass before you admit you’re wrong?

                Wow, you didn’t just move the goal posts, you shipped them cross state.

                And that ratio, yikes!

                • stella@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Dang, you’re really dedicated to this.

                  Lol, gonna block you now. Getting annoying seeing you reply to all my posts.

          • Wilzax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            By 2080 either China will invade Taiwan or have a completely different government. There is no way the CCP doesn’t invade Taiwan by then

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My understanding is that they know it’s not worth it for them. But unfortunately the “glory “ of the “reunification “ makes it worth it for their leaders that want to be remembered for this.

        • stella@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Ukraine is not nearly as strategically valuable to the US as Taiwan.

          Try to focus on the subject at hand instead of resorting to analogies.

      • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of things in China are going downhill: trade, banks, real state. China isn’t just going for Taiwan, it’s projecting imperialism all around, even with India, another BRICS member. Taiwan is just the biggest mark. I wouldn’t cross off options for what imperialist despots will or will not do when they become increasingly desperate.

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s creating a new front in regards to the proxy wars. Russia still has the numerical advantage over Ukraine in regards of people it throws into the grinder, but now Iran can get more involved by trying to harass through the Israel-Hamas conflict which decreases the provisions available for Ukraine.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you take him at his word, then that implies that Putin and Iran teamed up together to start conflict in Gaza, purposely to reduce support for the Ukraines in their war.

    Be really sad if it’s true, as that means people are dying in a war in one part of the world to support a war in another part of the world, a war they have no part in.

    • Zippit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Israel right now wants to be Ukraine. Ukraine has won the people’s hearts by fighting so hard despite overwhelming odds. They’re paying with their lives to stop Russia not only from destroying them, but also from invading other parts of Europe.

      They should be honoured.

        • Historical_General@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard Israel actually wants sympathy too, and get jealous of the support given to European nations when they get hit by terror attacks or random disasters like the cathedral burning. Israel should understand they are a military base in the middle of the Muslim world. They are percieved as a colony. And seeing the amount of military aid and impunity they recieve from the Europeans and America it’s only strengthened that view.

    • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, the naming of the article has sure aged liked milk.

      Any pro russian dumbass can point to it (without reading it, of course) and scream: “SEE SEE! THESE EVIL UKRAINIANS WANT TO KILL ALL RUSSIANS 😭😭😭😭” while the article just says they need to focus on security and intelligence which (until now) Israel was known for. The attack shows it wasn’t really true.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    This has prompted fears of war fatigue among Kyiv’s Western allies, with suggestions of growing reluctance in some capitals to continue giving Ukraine advanced weapons and funds.

    Russia’s defence ministry was later quoted by the country’s state-run news agencies as saying that 13 out of 15 Ukrainian missiles fired on the plant in the city of Kerch, eastern Crimea, were shot down, but a Russian ship was damaged.

    Speaking at Saturday’s briefing in Kyiv with visiting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Mr Zelensky said: “It’s clear that the war in the Middle East is taking away the focus” from Ukraine.

    The Ukrainian leader recalled that last year, there had also been a lot of talk about a stalemate on the vast battlefield in Ukraine - but he pointed to Kyiv’s subsequent major military victories in the north-eastern Kharkiv region and Kherson in the south.

    “All the [war] goals that were set must be achieved,” Dmitry Peskov said, adding that Ukraine must realise that “even talking about any prospects for the Kyiv regime’s victory on the battlefield is absurd”.

    President Putin has repeatedly claimed that Ukraine’s counter-offensive had failed, while his Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said this week that Kyiv was losing the war despite supplies of new weapons from Nato allies.


    The original article contains 698 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is taking away the focus is the fact that he supported the ethnic cleansing and genocide that Israel is committing in Palestine. So he thought that these things are not inherently bad, but only bad when they are happening to yourself - and fuck everyone else.

    Now he’s just finding out that that might not have been the smartest move, if he have to explain to the world again that they must give a fuck about his war.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          “he supported the ethnic cleansing and genocide that Israel is committing in Palestine.”

          You can’t make a blatantly inflammatory comment like that without being asked to source it.

          https://www.axios.com/2023/10/11/zelensky-israel-hamas-war-gaza-visit-netanyahu

          "Zelensky was one of the first leaders to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and express support for Israel.

          “In the face of such a terrorist strike, everyone who values life must stand in solidarity … Israel has the full right to defend itself against terror,” Zelensky said in a statement shortly after the attack."

          It’s a bit of a leap to go from that to full on support for ethnic cleansing.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is not the same as calling for ethnic cleansing.

              Someone punches you in the face, you have a right to defend yourself. You don’t have a right to kill them, burn their house down, murder their entire family, and then take out the rest of the block “just to be sure”.

              • HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Okay devoid of all context and reality and focusing only on the rhetoric, you have a point.

                Now imagine if I commit a genocide while claiming a right to defend myself, like the Nazis did? How is that phrase being deployed in that historical example?

                If you claim a right to defend yourself while committing a genocide, it is in fact the same as calling for genocide.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Saying Israel has the right to defend itself us not the same thing as your accusation of supporting ethnic cleansing.

              If you can source that accusation, I’m sure people would love to see it.

        • Einar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thought so.

          Means I can safely disregard your statements.

          • HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because his very political existence has been to pull Ukraine to the west and Israel is the US’s 51st state. Things are going very badly for him and he’s eager to get as much favor from the patron state as he can. He’s going to get eaten alive by his local politics.

  • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    115
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s best that this conflict ends sooner rather than later. I’ve heard that Ukraine is outnumbered 3 to 1 and is sending injured soldiers and teenagers to the front lines. There’s no hope of them winning. Hindsight is 20/20 and it’s clear that the Ukrainians’ best option would’ve been to surrender in February 2022 and negotiate a peace agreement when they still had some bargaining power. Now they have none and this guy will go down in shame as Ukraine’s worst leader.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They did have a peace agreement after Russia invaded…in 2014. Russia was handed Crimea. Yet, Appeasing dictators was proven yet again to not work. So, today they defend themselves from the invader.

      We must continue to support them, we must continue to ensure Russia does not win their war of conquest.

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve lost the plot. More weapons can’t solve a lack of soldiers. Unless Western Europe/NATO plan to start WW3, the outcome has been decided. The humane thing isn’t to cheer for more war, but to understand that cheering for war itself was a mistake.

        We were told Ukraine could win. We were told wrong. The people who gave us this false impression also told us we’d win the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Last I checked, those wars didn’t result in the victory we were promised, either.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every gun and dollar given to Ukraine is a gun and dollar used against Russia, one of the US’s most obnoxious enemies. Every resource that Russia has to spend in the war is more expensive for them than it is for us, which will give them less resources to spend on being a pain to the US. Ukraine has almost no reason not to fight since losing means a loss of their country anyways, we could either take advantage of this opportunity or we can wait until Ukraine is weaker.

          • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least this take is honest about the disregard for human lives as long as it furthers the interests of the US.

            • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The better option would be to not help Ukraine and allow them to be steamrolled by a genocidal Russia? That is somehow better for Ukraine? They are fighting for their lives, we must continue to give them the tools to not be massacred by the invader.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately you don’t have to look very hard around here to find them. Lemmy is absolutely swarming with paid propagandists from the usual suspect countries.

    • stmcld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t that peace deal more in ukraine’s favour at the time? And then their western allies ordered them to refuse it?