• danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s why we should stop using them. If they have zero users, they’ll eventually stop the Fedora project and the Community can keep pace with Debian or openSuse. openSuse can easily step into Fedora and Red Hat’s shoes.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instead of trying to tear down things that work, try building up the distros that don’t.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that sounds like work. It’s a lot easier to shit on other people’s volunteer efforts than to actually contribute anything constructive yourself.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to understand that Red Hat/Fedora regards the Linux Community as “free loaders”. That’s how they designed described anyone wanting access to Red Hat Server source code.

        That’s what they think of you and me and all the great developers who make a lot of the software we use, often in their free time and at no cost.

        Most of the distros and software you use on Linux is made and maintained by people who are not paid but do it for the love of Libre open source freedom loving computing for all.

        That is the FOSS way. Red Hat/Fedora do not share this view. They see us all as free loaders.

        If all the great Devs who contribute so much to GNU/Linux had that attitude, you’d literally have no free distro or apps.

        That means no poor third world person would ever have access to an operating system or pc. Only us well off people in the developed world. That’s anti FOSS.

        Don’t support ass hats like Red Hat/Fedora who stand against that.

        And now we see Canonical also being ass hats but only by including telemetry in Ubuntu, but forcing snaps on end users, blocking flatpak out of the box (you can still install it yourself but newbies won’t know this) and they are aiming to eventually make Ubuntu snap only. Not to mention they worked with Microsoft to make “Linux subsystem for Windows” which is a real insult to Linux and FOSS.

        Use Debian and other Community based distros which have zero corporate funding or involvement and are 100% by the people for the people

    • Mane25@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they have zero users, they’ll eventually stop the Fedora project

      That would be a very sad loss.

    • Kaidao@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would this be a good thing at all? One of the main goals of the ecosystem is to have multiple choices, and as others in this thread has mentioned, Fedoras made significant progress for the adoption of Linux as a whole

    • vhalragnarok@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OpenSuse has a very well defined pipeline:

      Tumbleweed -> Leap (maybe Slowroll) -> SLE.

      OpenSuse is not going to break new ground. It’s all about OBS and testing software before it hits their Paid Enterprise offerings. And they have almost a fully automated procedure for this. OpenSuse is not going to push Wayland only nor what will become the standard. It’s not in their ethos. OpenSuse is there to build SLE’s next release.

      Debian being cutting edge?! Never. Debian is Debian, very slow to adopt anything. Debian is about offering a very stable release schedule. Debian will never push the ecosystem forward, it’s not Debian’s goal. You want a reliable system that just works? Debian is inarguably the king.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree 100%. And both are 100% Community. openSuse is privately owned and supported by a massive Community.

        Debian is perfect for reliability (although opensuse is very reliable) who don’t need the latest and don’t like installing updates all the time. 100% Community based.

        Two fantastic, shining examples of the power of Community supported software 💪