he said. “We’ll be gone, and it’ll be gone because of an advertiser boycott.”… eeer, no.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      A muskrat and a religious nut, that’s a rare twofer. Usually musk suckers are atheist techbros.

      • sousmerde{retardatR}@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I expected at least a downvote though :'(, am i becoming mainstream ?

        I can debate in favor of E.Musk or religions if you’re interested(, my computer crashed a week ago so i’ve got time for now), Internet is there for us to learn after all, there’s not much point for me to stay in Lemmygrad(, yeah, i’m also a communist, too many defects for a single little boy).

        And yeah, this world is infuriating, not funny(, but be happy if you want to, i’ll stay angry).

          • sousmerde{retardatR}@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            All billionaires are thieves but it’s hard to argue that the state or citizens would have accomplished as much as his teams.
            He’s the billionaire who did the most, why should he also be the first to be criticised, it doesn’t make sense he should be the last.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You’re right. The government would’ve paid far more beurocrats in the process of pissing away 40 billion.

              • sousmerde{retardatR}@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Twitter was increasing its censorship(, do you need proof for that affirmation ?), would you trust the government to own the “townsquare”/“marketplace of ideas” ? I would only trust a government truly owned by its citizens, in a real/direct democracy with efficient counterpowers.
                He had many more ideas in order to use these 40 billions, but thought that twitter/‘freedom of expression’ is worth it(, that’s what he’s repeating, since you won’t believe in his good intentions what’s your opinion on such a huge loss a money ?), now everyone tries to ruin twitter, and you support them, because he’s not censoring enough for you apparently, is that the reason ? Bad nazis that shouldn’t be allowed to spread hate ? Can’t you see that our governments want to keep their control on the narrative, or do you just find “normal” that our newspapers agree between them on our foreign policy(, just as the medias of our unfree enemies brainwash their citizens(, yet we’ve strangely never read them once)) ?
                A journalist who’s “anti-system” isn’t deemed acceptable for the owners of the (legacy )medias, hence s.he/we only have alternative medias and some fringe portions of the Internet left(, for now), seems worth fighting for.