I’d love to hear what people here think of this. I hate proprietary kernel modules, I’m sure most people here do too, so do you think there is legal ground to force proprietary module vendors to release their source code?

  • znapop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 years ago

    […] legal ground to force proprietary module vendors to release their source code?

    What would make anyone think that? No one has to publish their code. If you really want a FLOSS kernel you’ll have to find open replacements for those modules or make them yourself.

      • znapop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        I have to admit that I’m not all that knowledgeable about licensing, so I did a little research and you are totally right. My bad! Legal means would totally be possible then, but that’d require someone actually pressing charges. Since that hasn’t happened yet, I fear it’s pretty unlikely at least in the foreseeable future…

    • ufra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      If you really want a FLOSS kernel you’ll have to find open replacements for those modules or make them yourself.

      basically openbsd?