It is healthy to be skeptical or to understand motivations without baselessly assuming a benevolent authority, majority or status quo, but similar to what danoss said, it’s usually a naive idealist assumed negativity that should be replaced by a more nuanced understanding of people’s motivations rather than branding peoples’ negative behaviors as universal, inevitable or human nature.
It is healthy to be skeptical or to understand motivations without baselessly assuming a benevolent authority, majority or status quo, but similar to what danoss said, it’s usually a naive idealist assumed negativity that should be replaced by a more nuanced understanding of people’s motivations rather than branding peoples’ negative behaviors as universal, inevitable or human nature.