• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Wait and see” for what though? Meta is already a known bad actor in social media. Why give them the benefit of the doubt?

      • GONADS125@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Man, I can’t believe the hot stove burned me, again!

        Maybe next time will be different…

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I forgot about that quote haha. That’s such a great retort to this “wait and see” approach.

          Pay attention @Ruud, this is what Mark Zuckerberg thinks of you.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Zuckerberg requesting and being given the your intimate personal information, isn’t really the same as s Zuckerberg plan to make information on a Meta social network readable from another social network, but sure. I’m not saying Meta is trustworthy, I’m saying let’s see what they do. Having a way for people to interact with people on Threads, without having to join Threads could be quite useful.

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s a bit of polemic that suggests that the main reason for blocking Threads is that is full off appalling hateful content. I haven’t used Threads since in initially signing up, so I had a quick look and it wasn’t particularly toxic, as far as I can see. If it is - and that content comes across, that is of course good reason for instances to block it - and I’m sure they will. Meanwhile I was amused to see on Threads the same debate been handled from the opposite direction:

              • GONADS125@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                There’s plenty of justification not to federate beyond the extremism, from the unethical experiments they conduct on their users to their aiding in genocide.

                • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  OK. Personally, I’m quite interested in it from the opposite point of view. I’m working with a large public body in the UK, who currently use Twitter and I’m attempting to get them interested in setting up their own Mastodon instance as an alternative. (Twitter embeds don’t work on their public websites any more).

                  Having the potential ability to reach Threads users is certainly helping me persuade them about thinking about the move to Mastodon - and not Threads.

      • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lol dumb nerds are the worst. In our company they hired bunch of devs who built the app before the deadline thinking they will get promoted and now most of them are redundant and one works in support.🤣🤣