tsugu@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 24 days agoUbuntu spotted in the latest Mark Rober videoslrpnk.netimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageUbuntu spotted in the latest Mark Rober videoslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAnna@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 days agoLet’s burn him at the stake for supporting snap \s
minus-squaretsugu@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-224 days agoYou act as if Snap was bad in any way. Proprietary backend does not equal bad. Edit: Most people don’t care about FOSS vs proprietary. And the snap client is FOSS anyways, plus it’s capable of installing snaps from local files.
minus-squareLeFantome@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoI will not use a system with snap and has nothing to do with being proprietary. One of the reasons that I could not use Ubuntu is that I cannot control using snap or not. They even use it to install apps that you install via apt. The fact that the only time I did use a system with snap left me with the impression that it is an absolute performance pig certainly does not help.
Let’s burn him at the stake for supporting snap
\s
You act as if Snap was bad in any way. Proprietary backend does not equal bad.
Edit: Most people don’t care about FOSS vs proprietary. And the snap client is FOSS anyways, plus it’s capable of installing snaps from local files.
I will not use a system with snap and has nothing to do with being proprietary.
One of the reasons that I could not use Ubuntu is that I cannot control using snap or not. They even use it to install apps that you install via apt.
The fact that the only time I did use a system with snap left me with the impression that it is an absolute performance pig certainly does not help.