• 1 Post
  • 245 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • I think it’s great to have at least one person thinking about these things.

    I can’t deny that her urge to decorate does make the house look better. It makes me happy.

    I just don’t think she can comprehend the absolute vacuum in my brain where “home anesthetics” should be.


  • Windex007@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldNeeds
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I had a similar conversation with my wife about table cloth length.

    She just kept pushing it: “what do you think about a table cloth that’s longer?” “What if it was shorter?” “What if it was longer one direction than another direction?”

    My love, I don’t think about table cloths. No part of my brain is equipped to evaluate hypothetical cloths in a way that would be realistically beneficial to the conversation.











  • I mean, there is some nuance. Sucks for memes, because they thrive on the lack of nuance, but anyways…

    Depending on implementation, you gotta be careful to avoid the top panel becoming rock paper scissors.

    If class switching is cheap (say, every respawn), you’ve just built a very very expensive rock paper scissors simulator.



  • I guess the part I don’t understand what you’re trying to assert re: time since “industrialization” vs wealth inequality.

    Are you saying industrialization is responsible for lowering inequality or creating it?

    If you’re suggesting it creates inequality, then I would expect Europe to have higher inequality than China. It does not.

    If you are suggesting it reduces inequality, then I would expect China’s wealth inequality to be trending downwards since the 70s. It is not. It has risen sharply in that time frame.

    I’m still assuming that I’m just misunderstanding your hypothesis… so I guess my question would just be:

    What do you hypothesize the process of industrialization does to weath distribution?