Content ID is a major part of how copyright currently works.

It’s literally not a part of how Copyright currently works. It’s how Google automated copyright claims on their platforms.

None of my creative works are in Content ID. People are not being sued through Content ID. Content ID flags stuff and at worst removes it. It is up to the copyright holder to decide what they want to do.

No it doesn’t. It would work like Copyright currently works.

I don’t need my works to be in any database for them to be protected by copyright. I simply have to declare their license or have the license be assumed by not declaring it. That’s how it already works. You, the owner of the copyrighted works, has to sue the infringer. It’s not an automated process. Your ‘likeness’ doesn’t need to be in any database if you can prove they used your likeness. Content ID was an attempt by Google to automate the removal process on their platforms so they could wash their hands of the problem.

Is Google your government?

Do you also think all of your creative works are in a government database somewhere?

Most governments are asleep at the wheel, generally.

LibreWolf is Firefox without the bullshit.

That’s awesome; I knew I’d seen it around!

what is that little pixel cat at the top? It also appears on https://katia.ripe.net/ is it referencing something?

reposotory

Firefox is in the same situation. Bloated umbrella org (Mozilla) that has dubious funding sources builds subpar products. Look at how much support implementing JPEG XL had, and how they just didn’t care and completely shut the conversation down when Google said no.

The Matrix foundation didn’t embrace and extend anything, as they were always in control of the spec.

EEE applies to when corporations (notably Microsoft) embraces projects that aren’t theirs and takes them under their wing, expands on functionality which attracts all the users and makes them the sole developer of that functionality, which kills the old, open forks. Microsoft then kills their version of it, and the whole thing dies.

and the backend is no longer fully open source

You have no idea how funny that is because I called it on a whim half a decade ago.

No; in the case of Matrix it’s because the spec is insanely bloated. Nobody wants to work on that, especially for free.

The combat and parkour of 2 are noticeably more floaty and forgiving than 1 and people (me included) were very unhappy with that when the game came out. We consequently never bothered playing it and the only people (still a sizable chunk of players) left are the ones who do enjoy it, even though it definitely betrays the design of the first game.

The grapple of the first game was a massive mistake but it’s easy to just not use it. Nothing in the game requires it.

The second game’s combat is forgiving and the parkour saves you where you would’ve fallen to your death in the first game. There are videos on YouTube of how egregious the combat and parkour lock-on mechanics can be where the first game doesn’t have them. It makes parkour and combat feel bad. People were unhappy with that.

But you can still think it’s a fun game. I’m not telling you what you feel is wrong, but the direction they took combat and parkour was wrong and many people pointed that out.

I’m not going to argue that you didn’t, or can’t, have fun, but people aren’t upset because it was different. The combat and parkour are objectively worse.

Not yet they haven’t

please i beg please god please

please have learned what made DL1 great and what made DL2 awful

Instances have 3 options. Save it locally, proxy it, or do nothing. Saving every federated image is not feasible for small instances. It’s not a fault of the protocol that instance operators don’t want to pay a thousand dollars a month for storage. Matrix has this problem, and look what happened to them: tiny instances are expensive to run, so don’t flourish.

whatever die mad I’ll keep being more productive than I’ve ever been