• 1 Post
  • 1.84K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月10日

help-circle






  • … You’re kidding, right? Are you 5, or something? It’s a serious question, I’m trying to understand how someone can write that down and be serious about it.

    You will always need police, because there will always be misbehaving elements in society. Be it due to mental illness or plain psychopaths, doesn’t really matter, you need a trained group of people designated to be the ones to keep society nice. Let’s call them “police”

    From the mad ramblings of what you wrote, it sounded like the description of police and a judge / justice system only much, much worse. You want random untrained idiots to decide on justice matters? I’m sorry no.

    I want a judge who has been trained and learned how to be ethical and impartial. I want police that has been trained, especially in de-escalation, who have been checked for not being psychopaths.

    There is nothing wrong with the basics of current police systems (not you US, you’re fucked up) we just need more focus on police being trained better (or, in case of the US, trained at all), being monitored better by independent groups to ensure abuses stay at a minimum.

    We need changes like limiting net worth. If we limit net worth to (just an example) 1 million dollar and any income after that goes 100% to taxes, we don’t need to change anything else. Nobody can be super rich anymore, nobody can have crazy bad influence anymore, we’d literally be all the same.

    Governments get huge tax incomes that can be used for free healthcare, free education, universal basic income, even. It’s a simple single change that will have the most impact.





  • In a direct confrontation, the US would walk over them as if they aren’t there. That’s why you don’t do that, you apply guerilla tactics. That’s why a bunch of basically goat herders in Afghanistan, of all places, managed to beat the Russians and the Americans.

    Let there be no doubt, the US got its ass handed there, and Afghanistan is a good part of the reasons why the USSR folded.

    I assume the Danish generals know this and likely have prepared something similar, but now with highly trained and well equipped soldiers.

    I think an invasion of Greenland would finish the US, especially since the Danes have a lot of experience in how to fight winter conditions while the US not so much.

    I think something similar applies as well in, for example, Mexico. There are boat loads of highly (US military) trained criminals over there with a lot of experience in sending messages. Once the hundredth soldier was found dangling from a bridge, or cut up in a salad, it might become hard to explain to Maga base why really is worth it.

    The US is awesome at invading. It absolutely sucks at keeping anything



  • Nah, AI will already do that automatically because any and all system loses something in inefficiencies. Same like if you put a theoretical 100 miles of gas worth in your tank that turns into 20 in practice because the combustion engine has an efficiency of 30ish%, you have air and tire resistance, etc etc.

    AI has the same for information, and what comes out is always a certain fraction of the 100% that went in

    Since poisoning the pool makes AI unreliable up to the point where it becomes useless, it has the potential to stop the AI madness. I’d be all for that.