You will always find exceptions in everything. Meaning wrong decisions can be made, from those who decide who actually gets such a prize. Because Obama seems to be an negative example here, I also would have given it to someone else at that time but that does not mean we should abandon it entirely.
I would agree that the prize itself is more a symbolic thing which gives you an entry into history for your work or something you did. Personally I think we could address the criticism of the Nobel Prize if we make the vote more transparent and public. People like you and me should get a chance and a voice on who gets something and then democratically vote for or against it.
However, I do understand the criticism of such a price but the problem I see is that if we disallow such things or abandon it, we need to abandon other principles and awards too, some which I consider more useless such as the golden globe and other awards.
You seem to be moving the goalposts. First you said
You cannot look into someone and you cannot predict what he will do next. Humans are not perfect.
Then when I pointed out that humans being imperfect doesn’t preclude us from predicting what humans will do, you’ve now changed your argument to
You will always find exceptions in everything. Because Obama seems to be an negative example here, I also would have given it to someone else at that time but that does not mean we should abandon it entirely.
I think you’re being far too charitable to the Nobel Committee and I’m trying to figure out why one would defend such people whose work is so largely symbolic. Nobel prizes are like most awards-- utterly meaningless, largely symbolic, and hardly useful in making actual progress. Leftists and working class people in general should not put any weight into pompous awards like Nobel prizes.
You will always find exceptions in everything. Meaning wrong decisions can be made, from those who decide who actually gets such a prize. Because Obama seems to be an negative example here, I also would have given it to someone else at that time but that does not mean we should abandon it entirely.
I would agree that the prize itself is more a symbolic thing which gives you an entry into history for your work or something you did. Personally I think we could address the criticism of the Nobel Prize if we make the vote more transparent and public. People like you and me should get a chance and a voice on who gets something and then democratically vote for or against it.
However, I do understand the criticism of such a price but the problem I see is that if we disallow such things or abandon it, we need to abandon other principles and awards too, some which I consider more useless such as the golden globe and other awards.
You seem to be moving the goalposts. First you said
Then when I pointed out that humans being imperfect doesn’t preclude us from predicting what humans will do, you’ve now changed your argument to
I think you’re being far too charitable to the Nobel Committee and I’m trying to figure out why one would defend such people whose work is so largely symbolic. Nobel prizes are like most awards-- utterly meaningless, largely symbolic, and hardly useful in making actual progress. Leftists and working class people in general should not put any weight into pompous awards like Nobel prizes.