It’s my, general, understanding that most people connect to the Internet through mobile apps.

If this is the case, then why have apps such as Remmel, Lemmur and jerboa taken a back seat?

IMHO, it would be a mistake to market Lemmy without these mobile apps functioning properly.

I have forked the three aforementioned mobile apps here and will try to ‘drum up’ support from developers wherever I can find them.

Please, if you don’t feel comfortable talking to me about this here, then send me a private message. Thank you.

  • @suspended@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    mobile websites

    Are you referring to websites that are mobile responsive?

    Maybe, there are developers out there that could make a mobile app experience ‘different’ than the browser experience. I believe there are.

    • @adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      In my experience, the main reason mobile websites suck is because they do so by design, in order to push users to install an app. Lemmy developers have no incentive to do so.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Exactly this. Companies preferr mobile apps because it allows them to do much more user tracking push their own advertisement etc. To this end they intentionally make it difficult to use their websites in mobile browsers (see Twitter or Reddit), to force people to use apps.

        Its really a dark pattern and a website like Lemmy works perfectly fine on mobile browsers.

    • Preston Maness ☭
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Are you referring to websites that are mobile responsive?

      Yes. My general philosophy is that, if it can be done in the browser, then it shouldn’t need an app. Leave mobile apps to the cases where the browser can’t get the job done.

      • @suspended@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Using Lemmy on a smart phone with a browser should work fine since the site is built to be responsive. However, having a native Lemmy application for Android and iOS could provide opportunities for further feature development that isn’t included with the browser version. That is why I believe it is a good idea to keep these apps going.

        • erpicht
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          What is the point of adding exclusive features to the mobile application? What sort of features should these be? Purely cosmetic?

          • @Echedenyan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Two examples:

            • Notifications in real time: not just by email or having to maintain the browser open and without sound.
            • Sharing using the own sharing dialogs.

            However, I personally use the website by now and rely on email notifications.

              • @Echedenyan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I have it like that but notifications doesn’t seem to be supported or, at least, with the application closed.

                Also the sound and light seem to be specific of the whole browser applications as far as I could test right know.

            • erpicht
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I stand corrected on the utility of app exclusive features. I never considered it, but I suppose I rather like how I don’t get notifications through lemmur. Though I understand how that’s a hassle for others who want them.