Ignore the fact that it’s coming from Breitbart. This is really freaky in more than one way.

FTA:

Against stiff competition, the alliance of tech and media giants has devised a plan that may constitute Big Tech’s most brazen power-grab yet.

According to Microsoft’s press release, it has partnered with several other organizations to form the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA).

Put simply, the purpose of this organization is to devise a system whereby all content on the internet can be traced back to its author.

The press release states that it will develop these specifications for “common asset types and formats,” meaning videos, documents, audio, and images.

Whether it’s a meme, an audio remix, or a written article, the goal is to ensure that when content reaches the internet, it will come attached with a set of signals allowing its provenance — meaning authorship — can be detected.

  • @Niquarl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    173 years ago

    Honestly is it not possible to find a single other source than Breitbart? If this is fact important one wouldn’t need to read a Breitbart post.

    • @kitsunekun@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      -19
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Dumb comment is dumb.

      EDIT: please stay on topic, as the rules for this sub encourage it: Try to keep things on topic

        • @kitsunekun@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          -173 years ago

          Unsure if you are being sarcastic. But the level of idiocy and self-absorbedness required to make that first post complaining about the source rather than what’s reported says a lot about the person: “hey, look, it’s not a source I like, therefore it’s invalid”.

          Typical American narcissism.

          • @AlmaemberTheGreat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            133 years ago

            I do not know anything about breitbart, but what I know is that there are certain sources that are just… untrustworthy. Just saying.

            • @kitsunekun@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              -83 years ago

              And what happens to the individual that came to my thread with the explicit intention of derailing it without any consideration? Let me guess? Nothing. As others have pointed out, the topic at hand is legitimate, but all the negative attention now is on me and the source. How ridiculous!

              You sure are on your way to become Reddit with this double standard! Keep it up.

              • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                53 years ago

                There is no double standard. Its simply that insulting other users is against the rules, but there is nothing that forbids criticising sources (which I wouldnt consider derailing).

                • @kitsunekun@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -5
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  Well, let’s agree to disagree on the “derailing” topic. As for insulting people, I just said his comment was dumb. I don’t see how that’s an insult. Even intelligent people say dumb stuff from time to time, nothing wrong with it, I do say dumb stuff as well.

                  • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    43 years ago

                    This is not the kind of behaviour we like to see here. If you keep acting like this then you will be banned.

              • @Nevar@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                43 years ago

                You can’t force people to agree with your opinion man. I agree they shouldn’t dismiss an argument based on its source alone (unless they’re unable to think critically in which case that’s sad.) But mod is right. Downvote and disagree, but don’t insult. It hurts your arguments position. You’re trying to take shortcuts when you insult in trying to convince people of your position. It rarely works on the internet, not least because we’re in a world where your opinion is a minority one and the US government is actively trying to quell dissent and push a narrative.

      • @Niquarl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        53 years ago

        Even Wikipedia blocks Breitbart links by default… It’s pretty ridiculous to just say I only want sources that agree with me or whatever. I’m asking any other source, whatever from L’humanité to The New York Times through the Wall Street Journal I don’t care. Anything that has a bit more credence is appreciated.

        Honestly after the slur filter the admin made that I disagreed with, though I completely understand why they did it, maybe it’s time to block certain site (from malicious spam filled shit to even a couple of news media, Breitbart, Daily Mail or Fdesouche seem like a pretty good start IMHO. After all this is floss so one can go share Breitbart on another server.

        • @Ratoeira547@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I agree with you, the Lemmy devs should block BBC web addresses for spreading misinformation about China and the list goes on.