• markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you read the article, the rules were only that both parties have to agree on a test and if someone passed the test they won the prize. There wasn’t a “gotcha” clause like “Oh since you did it it’s clearly allowed by physics and we don’t have to pay up!” So like if someone showed they had psychic powers sufficient to pass an agreed upon test it doesn’t matter if there’s a natural explanation for it, they would have still won the prize.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember seeing piece of some TV show that invited both Randi and some “psychic”. The psychic showed his power of bending spoons, then Randi asked to do the trick again, only using one of his spoons. The fraud failed.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just this morning, someone in a Discord I’m in (who wouldn’t just fake stories) was explaining how someone they knew had a psychotic break on psychedelics, and, in the ambulance, narrated the paramedics’ childhoods with disturbing accuracy

        I think it’s entirely possible this person is being honest while also just not having a firm grasp over what actually happened, due to having a psychotic break from psychedelics. The paramedic simply agreeing to whatever they said (if the conversation did happen—I’ve been unsure whether a conversation I thought I had was real or not just from smoking too much weed) could have been interpreted as much deeper and more profound than it was.

        None of this requires ill intent. The mind is just incredibly bad at making and retrieving memories in the way we want (infallible, like a video) even when you aren’t on drugs.

        • monotremata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It could also just be cold reading. People who haven’t been exposed to that can find it eerily accurate, even though it’s just a combination of random guessing with reinforcing the guesses that got reactions. It’s the kind of thing that both parties could participate in without either being explicitly familiar with the technique.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most of that is just mentalism, which is effective and useful but works off a psychological and stochastic approach but is absolutely explainable and not supernatural despite its applications in manipulating people. See: Jacob Wysocki in the one year later episode of game changer

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          A LOT of mentalism is stage magic, and has nothing to do with psychology. That’s part of the set dressing they’re trying to sell you, they’re just magicians as with a 21st century coat of paint on top.