In the late 2000s there was a push by a lot of businesses to not print emails and people use to add a ‘Please consider this environment before printing this email.’

Considering how bad LLMs/‘ai’ are with power consumption and water usage a new useless tag email footer should be made.

  • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Whether its useful or not is another discussion, but if you used a LLM to write an email in 2 minutes that you would use 10 minutes for (including searches and whatever), you actually generate LESS CO2 than the manual process:

    • PC, 200W/h, 10 min: 33W
    • Monitor, 30W/h: 5W
    • Google searches, lets say 3, about 0,3W/Search: 1W

    equals ~40W

    compared to:

    • PC, 200W/h, 2 min: ~7W
    • Monitor, 30W/h: 1W
    • ChatGPT, 3 requests (normally you would expect less requests than google searches, but for the argument…): 9W

    equals ~17W.

    And that is excluding many other factors like general energy costs for infrastructure, which tilt the calculation further in chatgpts favor.

    EVERYTHING we do creates emissions one way or another, we create emissions by simply existing too; it’s important to set things into perspective. Both upper examples compare to running a 1000W microwave for either 2:20 min or 1:05 min. You wouldn’t be shocked by those values.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This would not save anything as you would not use your monitor and pc 8 minutes less in that scenario. Or at least I would not. Its sorta moot as generating an email is definitely not something I would use ai for. Granted I really doubt I would spend 10 minutes on an email unless it was complicated and I was doing something else with it and keeping it open while doing something else as I put it together. Any savings would assume the ai generated email did not result in more activity than one you answered yourself. To have savings you would genuinely have to use the resource less that day or week or such.

      • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, that depends on workload and the employer. If you are one of the lucky ones where it’s just important that shit gets done on time, it would result it lower usage. That’s on the employer, not on the LLM.

        3W/request (4W if you include training the model) is nothing compared to what we use in our everyday life, and it’s even less when looking what other activities consume. Noone would have an issue with you running a blender for 30 seconds, even tho it’s the same energy usage as an Chatbot request.