Maybe for a few days/weeks, but don’t you think sharing information and power with everyone can lead to sane consensus? I’m unaware of your specifics, but i would argue that in most productive and service branches, self-organization would lead to much better outcomes in all regards. Workers self-organization has a good track record throughout history. “Autogestion, l’encyclopédie internationale” is a good resource in french about self-organization across time and space (in ten volumes), but unfortunately i don’t know of such detailed accounts in english language.
A company cannot have more than 200 employees in the same city.
Non-federated social networks are illegal.
How about adding a clause about “there can be no managers nor bosses or shareholders”? :)
Who is gonna run the company then? If you this with my team, chaos follows.
Maybe for a few days/weeks, but don’t you think sharing information and power with everyone can lead to sane consensus? I’m unaware of your specifics, but i would argue that in most productive and service branches, self-organization would lead to much better outcomes in all regards. Workers self-organization has a good track record throughout history. “Autogestion, l’encyclopédie internationale” is a good resource in french about self-organization across time and space (in ten volumes), but unfortunately i don’t know of such detailed accounts in english language.
I am just suggesting it is not for everybody. I do agree that sharing responsibility yields better results.
This should end the need for entire professional degree called MBA.