• hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I will happily switch over once libinput isn’t absolute ass with my touchpad! Or if I could adjust its settings in any meaningful way!! Or if you could let me use my old touchpad driver!!!

    Until then you can attempt to pry x11 from my cold undead still-animated hands

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Wayland is the one thing that fixed a whole shit-ton of my problems overnight and now I find out nobody wants to use it under any circumstances.
    ¯\(ツ)/¯ Alrighty then

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    x11 when you try to use 2 monitors that don’t have the exact same atomic composition:

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I think it took me 2 years to get six monitors on two GPUs working consistently under X11. Yes, I’m that fucking stubborn.

      Wayland worked right from the start.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Weird. I have to switch all my machines to x11 in order to get multiple monitors working. Wayland just renders back screens on everything but main. Also makes remote desktop access buggy as fuck if it works at all.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, my multimonitor experience is better under x11, especially gaming (also Lutris has more features for x11 too in that regard). I only use it on that machine tho.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I still use X11 & will continue to do so for as long as possible. Wayland’s not bad, X11 just seems to works better…

  • ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I like XFCE because is simple and my PC is a toaster with an NVIDIA card so…whenever I have XFCE on Wayland I’ll switch to it.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Im on boring mint, and Wayland sucks on it. Literally disables my ctrl and shift keys, and volume keys, and backgrounds are only black. Unusable. And I have all amd, 13 year old cpu. Oh and it screws up video playback

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Mint is pretty late to the Wayland party with Cinnamon. It’s probably one of the worst distros to try to use Wayland on.

      • ne0phyte@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You must use a different Wayland than I do.

        I play competitive multiplayer games with VRR on a 4k240 monitor in a tiling wm with direct scanout. Color management support (HDR, 10bit, anything beyond 8bit sRGB) is also coming along.

        I’ve never had a better working setup than this. Everything on X was painful. Even just getting vsync to work properly used to be tricky in some cases.

        I agree that wayland does miss features compared to X but a lot of them are conscious design decisions and don’t affect me personally. For example running graphical applications remotely through e.g. SSH or the complete lack of security allowing any application to easily read my keyboard input.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Xorg never worked quite right for me with multiple displays of different resolutions, orientations and refresh rates. Even after extensive setup, I would get screen tearing effects all the time. In wayland, everything just works OOTB for me.

        • BunScientist@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I set TearFree in the mesa driver settings (not sure if it’s amd only?) so there’s no tearing even without vsync, I have a small 50hz display and a 1080p 120hz without issues

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It actually does wreck the playability of games for me by disabling the ctrl and shift key. A known issue no one has bothered to look into. I cant complain tho, theyre working their butts off for free

      • RaccoonBall@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        if variable high refresh rate on my game monitor while discord and YouTube run at 60hz on the other wrecks playability, then definitely

        I’m not one of those people who loves tearing though, so its good enough for me

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’ve tried a few distros recently (Bazzite, Nobara, Debian…), all with Plasma+Wayland, and none of them work with my Wacom Intuos. Nobara with Gnome works fine (that’s what I’m using in the meantime), albeit with a limited feature set: can’t remap tablet area, can’t use or remap the tablet buttons.
    So, I’ve narrowed it down to something inbetween Plasma and Wayland. That’s all I know for now

    I use the tablet as a pointing device -using a mouse hurts my wrist after roughly 20mn (old injury). So it really is an accessibility issue…

    I have said this a few times before, apologies, but I’m hammering it because it’s not notorious enough.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s fucking weird people have such strong opinions about issues like X11 and systemd. They’re meant to be working in the background away from the user, and that’s exactly how I treat them. Actually systemd still provides some functions a user might have to interact with manually, for X11 I’m just baffled.

    When I take an uber, I don’t care whether the car has an automatic or manual transmission.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think the average user wouldn’t care, Linux just attracts nerds. And I think it’s totally fine and even good that people care how their computer works—it shows that users care about their software working for them, rather than just wanting to go along with whatever is given to them. I think a lot of the positions people take about these things are very silly, but I’d still prefer someone to have a silly opinion about X11/Wayland or pid 1 than to not have an opinion at all. It’s nice that users are being actively involved in deciding what they want their system to be; it’s a nice change from the average user who’s like “well microsoft is screenshotting my screen every 5 seconds and feeding it into copilot now, guess I’m going along with that”.

    • UnityDevice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Gnome forced me onto Wayland a few weeks ago and I’ve been dealing with issues ever since. Some issues even affecting the most basic level tasks like typing text, imagine dealing with that in 2025. Following your analogy, if the Uber with the fancy new transmission came to a halt every kilometre, you’d care too.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      When I take an uber, I don’t care whether the car has an automatic or manual transmission. But I care what MY CAR has! Especially since there isn’t a shop for my car and I have to do all my own maintenance. Like, init/systemd is a huge architectural change, it’s weird to you that people who depend on their computer to perform whatever function gives their life meaning and viability want to have a functional grasp of their system? That’s a big change to absorb for essentially no practical benefit to the problem domain.

      • Integrate777@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        If you only live in the GUI layer, you aren’t the driver. The implementation details are abstracted away from you. Your software are the real uber drivers, you’re just being driven around.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I found that systemd actually simplified all the things I was doing on sysvinit. BUT, I did hold out until Debian testing stopped supporting sysvinit, and I think waiting gave me a better experience.

        With X11 -> Wayland, the main thing holding me back finding a tiling compositor that will work under Plasma and is packaged for Debian and the learning at least the basics. My XMonad configuration isn’t that special, but I’m really quite used to not having to re-arrange my own windows, and being able to move/resize/refocus all with the home row and modifier keys. So, I’m probably going to wait until Debian testing ships a Plasma that doesn’t support X11, and have to do some learning then.

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to use some features that only worked on x11. Slowly I found alternatives or workarounds on wayland. So I understand the sentiment. Imagine you book an uber but it’s electric so they say you can’t book a ride that’s too long

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        I love your metaphor because it is exactly the kind of pedantry that is usually at play with X11 vs Wayland.

        “I can’t take an electric uber because it has an effective range less than 400 miles!”

        Who the fuck takes a uber to a destination over 4 hours away?

        A normal person rents a car, takes a bus, catches a train or buys a plane ticket. Ain’t no one faring a uber for a long trip to another city. But that’s exactly the kind of complaints from people obsessively clinging to X11. They have a hyper specific use case or workflow that almost no one else uses.

        • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Every single person has different problems and priorities, and until hyper specific use cases/workflows work on Wayland, many will stay on Xorg.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I understand and agree. Anyone who has a super specific use case that means they still use X11, go ahead, no one is stopping them. But to complain or trash Wayland on that basis is asinine. Every single change in paradigm breaks someone’s workflow, that’s impossible to avoid. But the responsible thing to do is to adapt either with new tools and resources, or with a slight change in workflow. They act like people are taking away their toy, when in reality it is just adding to the pile of available toys. But they are upset because their toy is old and won’t get repaired anymore, while the new toy is slightly different but a bit easier to clean and repair, so they get upset at the other kids for playing with it. Ignoring that the new toy doesn’t make the old toy disappear.

            • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              The problem is many distros are going to stop shipping Xorg, because it is “not needed” anymore.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                That’s where the adapt part comes in.

                I had a friend who collected CRTs and VHS players right at the turn from DVD to bluray. He didn’t argue to kill LCDs, HD video or CDs. He didn’t wrote to Sony to complain that he couldn’t find VHS on Walmart anymore or that his hyper specific CC format didn’t work on DVD the exact same way it did on VHS. He accepted that tech culture shifted and that to keep his hobby up he had to take up a lot of the upfront work of maintaining old tech alive. He learned to repair old CRTs and VHSs and keeps them running for libraries. Even collaborating to digitize particularly niche historical content.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my eyes, it’s the same deal as conservatives coping with the changing world. There is a version where they just shut up and let the rest of the tech landscape improve while they happily stick to the X they know (X.org or even XLibre).

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Getting left behind is the natural and inevitable consequence of obsolescence.

            • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              Yes, the people who refuse to either upgrade to Win11-compatible hardware or move to an OS compatible with their existing hardware will eventually get left behind. Both in terms of security and compatibility. It’s happened many times, from the fall of AGP in favour of PCIE, to every time Intel inroduced a new CPU socket. X11 is the next.

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Unless I’m terribly misunderstanding the word’s meaning (or anglophones once again redefined a word to reflect their current sensibilities), “conservative” doesn’t automatically imply politics, just that someone is resistant to new ideas. A person who only listens to music produced before the 20th century and goes into a rage when video game music composers are mentioned is a conservative, but not in terms of political views.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There are still existing issues with wayland that do not exist on X11. I’m talking, using last-gen consumer grade hardware that will break basic applications like, who knows, a web browser. Meanwhile the “upside” are extremely marginal to a lot of people. Different screen scaling isn’t implemented using proper DPI on most implementations, variable refresh rate is not something most people care about (I sure don’t care that my second monitor is capped at 120Hz instead of 144Hz because of my first monitor), etc.

      So, yeah, for some people, it’s not a matter of preference, it’s a matter of having a stable, working system vs. a broken system where basic features are not a given.

      If you took an uber and the car was a horse-driven carriage and your seat was a hole in a rotted plank, you’d complain.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I’d have to change desktop environments, because my current one only has “experimental” support in the latest version, and my distro is years behind, anyway. Your choices are pretty much KDE, Gnome or building your own desktop with a standalone window manager, and I don’t like any of those options.