• Conselheiro@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I really hate the “paper tiger” thing because most people haven’t read it in context and interpret it weirdly so I feel compelled to post the context here sorry sorry

    When we say U.S. imperialism is a paper tiger, we are speaking in terms of strategy. Regarding it as a whole, we must despise it. But regarding each part, we must take it seriously. It has claws and fangs. We have to destroy it piecemeal. For instance, if it has ten fangs, knock off one the first time, and there will be nine left, knock off another, and there will be eight left. When all the fangs are gone, it will still have claws. If we deal with it step by step and in earnest, we will certainly succeed in the end.

    Strategically, we must utterly despise U.S. imperialism. Tactically, we must take it seriously. In struggling against it, we must take each battle, each encounter, seriously. At present, the United States is powerful, but when looked at in a broader perspective, as a whole and from a long-term viewpoint, it has no popular support, its policies are disliked by the people, because it oppresses and exploits them. For this reason, the tiger is doomed. Therefore, it is nothing to be afraid of and can be despised. But today the United States still has strength, turning out more than 100 million tons of steel a year and hitting out everywhere. That is why we must continue to wage struggles against it, fight it with all our might and wrest one position after another from it. And that takes time.

    It seems that the countries of the Americas, Asia and Africa will have to go on quarrelling with the United States till the very end, till the paper tiger is destroyed by the wind and the rain.

    Full text: U.S. Imperialism is a Paper Tiger

  • SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In conventional warfare the US will probably win most wars they engage in. It is not that hard to figure out key military locations in a country and attack/occupy them and the US has one of the most advanced armies in the world to do so.

    The guerilla warfare that follows is more difficult as the US has shown time and time again by losing. When every person you need can be a potential opponent, with no clear centralised structure and supply chain, even the big armies of the world can struggle.

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Also Yemen has one of the most armed populations in the world; the only way the military would win against Yemen is engaging in a Gaza style air focused genocide, which is what libs keep saying is what prevented America from winning. I genuinely despise that supposedly pro-Palestinian libs took Yemen so personally and saw themselves in the government’s struggle against the Houthis; my guess is it’s because Biden was in office and this was Biden’s battle.