• Mobocratic Egoist@lemmy.161.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 years ago

    I agree, but I’m also not sure the FSF itself needs to be leading the way. We need more organizations dedicated to free software, representing a diversity of schools of thought. FSF is just one perspective coming from a certain context and a different time period. More organizations will bring in fresh perspectives and people who may be more savvy in the modern web.

    • ufra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      Should these organisations be foundation type bodies or include product focused companies which advocate free?

      It’s a little uncomfortable to think FSF might not welcome any foundation type body which attempts to bring fresh perspectives to its turf, but it seems a possibility. Further splintering of not-proprietary (including free as well as open source) would also be counterproductive.

      Perhaps FSF clarifying their message for newer entrants and having several free product focused companies working in concert would be a viable approach?

      • Mobocratic Egoist@lemmy.161.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 years ago

        I am thinking of foundation-type bodies. Basically the FSF shouldn’t have a monopoly of ideas on the direction of the free software movement. The core philosophy is well-defined but personally I think the “single-issue” approach of the FSF is limited and we need to work in a broader political framework.