• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    At this point we need a serious effort to fork Firefox and maintain it as a sustainable open source project. I know there are a few forks floating around, but they’re small projects with only a handful of contributors. These kinds of efforts will never be a serious alternative.

    A web browser is one of the most important piece of software nowadays, and currently neither Chromium nor Firefox are true community efforts. We need something on the level of the Linux Kernel Foundation in my opinion.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Just to add and remind, the amount of LOC and work in a web browser and its engine is more than Linux kernel itself at this point. This goes for both Gecko and Blink/WebKit browsers.

      People underestimate the amount of work put in modern web browsers. They are ecosystems at this point.

      • nutomic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Thats because todays browsers are way too bloated. A fork that trims unnecessary features could be very effective.

        • sproid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          There are browsers that try that only to have broken websites left and right. cough*(GNOME Web)

          • nutomic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 years ago

            Its not only about the protocols, Firefox also has other useless features, like the integrated Pocket addon and probably more.

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you want something like the linux kernel, then those forks also have to be profitable enough to support firefox.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Or to get enough community funding as non-profit. The whole problem with Mozilla is precisely that it depends on profit and it’s driven by accountants.