• vegai@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Didn’t downvote you, but 1. seemed odd. Are you saying that if somebody hires somebody, they cannot get rid of that person no matter how they behave and work? Perhaps I didn’t understand the phrasing correctly — perhaps the stress was on “without notice”.

    Others are more or less agreeable, although possibly hard to enforce.

    • Ninjabread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      Other developed countries handle this fine. If someone is shit, you put them on a performance improvement plan, a formal step that shows the company is trying everything they can to up your performance and that also provides notice to the employee that they aren’t doing good enough. After a series of meetings over a period of time if the employee isn’t improving and the company can show they tried to bring them up to scratch then the employee can be let go. If you need to drop staff due to being overstaffed there are processes for this as well.

      This is far different than the current US situation, where you can lose your job today because your boss doesn’t like your shoes.

      • Travis Skaalgard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        Or if you’re a type of person they don’t like. “We didn’t fire him because he was black, we fired him for no reason at all, so it’s perfectly legal!”

    • Travis Skaalgard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Please read it again. They can FIRE you for any reason or without a reason, without notice. You can get fired here just because the boss doesn’t like you on a personal level, and it’s perfectly legal.