• Onfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wiki was getting popular when I was in college over 10 years ago. I recall a history professor telling me not to use Wikipedia as source. I am like, okay, I will just use the source wiki uses, which are pretty solid in my opinion. Wiki came a long way.

    • Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s important to remember that wikipedia, itself, isn’t a source, it’s a summary of different sources. It’s a great resource to find sources and get an overview of a topic, though.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as you verify the source still exists. There are so many dead links on Wikipedia.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please dig a little bit deeper. You may end up with a stack of links to 404 sites instead of actual sources. Just because you copied a citation from WP doesn’t mean the source actually exists, let alone contains the information you seek.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And it’ll get even better. That being said, it’s worth checking out the Talk pages on the articles you want to use, as they may contain information about what is (and isn’t) displayed.

      I started passively editing it and I’ve been incredibly impressed.