Hey do anybody know where you get a tv that supports 4k and does not have that locked up smarttv shit?

If there are none, does anybody know a tv that boots fast(less than 30 seconds) and displays an hdmi input by default without the need to choose the input from a menu.

Thanks in advance.

And sorry if I am in the wrong place.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does it bother anyone else to pay for all that “smartness” and then figure out how NOT to use it?

    How can consumers fight back against this bullshit?

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You aren’t paying for the smartness. You are actually getting a subsidized TV that should cost a whole lot more but is being sold for cheap since it is also a data collection device.

      Non smart TVs are more expensive than their smart counterparts.

      The only answer is to never give your smart tv access to your network and to use an external device for streaming.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right. What you really need is a tv that reacts less bad to being online. It’s a shame Logitech killed the Harmony because dumbing down your tv successfully generally requires a universal remote.

        • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a long time Harmony user, expert, and former employee … The Sofabaton remotes are the closest substitute I’ve found. Easy to configure and use. Just no “activities” like a Harmony. But at least you can set it to control the volume on X device when you have it in the mode to control Y device.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. All the extra circuitry costs money. Building and maintaining the software costs money. And that’s way more than you’re expected to “earn”.

        As much as it fuels your conspiracy boners, it’s not like Samsung is raking in billions by showing you ads.

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As much as it fuels your conspiracy boners

          If you want to discuss this topic further, I’d be happy to. But not if you’re going to causally throw around insults.

          You don’t know anything about me or my work experience.

          • AAA@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t know anything about me or my work experience.

            Throwing around insults is not helpful, but neither is “trust me bro”.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where was the trust me bro part in his response?
              OP literally said to not assume what he did or didnt???

            • Zastyion345@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just did some searching around and found out that smart tv with the same specs as dum tv is cheeper.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s the neat thing: I don’t need to.

            If you’re just parroting the same narrative without any basis like anybody else and also use the same narratives, I can safely assume that unless proven otherwise, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think that Facebook doesn’t cost money to build or run?

          A crappy years-old ARM-powered smartphone SOC stuck inside a TV costs next to nothing.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It bothers me a LOT!

      Especially when I don’t even use the smart shit, basically use it as a glorified monitor and the thing pops up a message “Our terms and conditions have changed”. I cannot use my fucking TV till I accept the new terms and if I refuse, the TV just turns off.

      It’s such bullshit! I own the TV, how can you change the terms and conditions after the fact? Can I change the terms and conditions? I know I paid $1000 for this TV, but I changed my mind, can you please give me back 250$. I altered the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further.

      Same with my goddamned piece of shit phone. Here is a new software version, it will remove 3 features you love and use every day, drains your battery twice as fast and makes the whole thing slow. You can maybe hack shit till it doesn’t update automatically and only occasionally bugs you about it. But then you don’t get any security updates or compatibility fixes, so that’s not really a good option either. So you buy a new device every 2 years, even though it was perfectly fine.

      I know the EU is working on it, but I can’t wait for the day manufacturers are forced to provide at least 5-7 years of security/compatibility updates for devices, without also bundling feature updates. And be legally bound to the terms and conditions at the moment of sale, no changing the deal after it’s done.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only solace I can offer is that I think most TOS have been deemed unenforceable since literarily no-one reads that shit.

        Somone correct me if I’m wrong please.

      • ooterness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Weird, the new ToC just says “I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further.”

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It bothers me it’s so hard to find one that doesn’t include it, but it doesn’t feel like it’s bloating the price to me, if that’s what you mean. Besides the insistence on the smart shit, TV’s have constantly been getting better, bigger, and yet still cheaper.

      It’s unfortunate, but if anything the smart features are part of why they’re staying so cheap. The TV costs the same to make no matter what, but when every company under the sun is paying a fee to have their app baked into the tv, you don’t have to charge the end-user as much to make the same profit. Not to mention the treasure trove of data you can collect(and sell) from the ones who connect it to the internet.

      • This happens everywhere now.

        We had the garage doors replaced, and replaced the openers since they were also a couple decades old and a small part of the total cost. Every damned opener that wasnt bare-bones had smart features. Camera, motion detection, wifi… of course, none of it to any sort of standard, and requiring a special app and account with the vendor. Smart devices are fine - I want smart, to some standard like zwave - but I’ll be god damned if I’m going to make an account with Genie so they can track and sell my garage door use.

        Same thing with the dishwasher. The house being as old as it is, all the devices are hitting planned obsolecense at the same time. All the new dishwashers that have any decent features are smart. Again, with some shitty bespoke app, and requiring an account. This time, I got the damned thing and just haven’t installed the app or configured the wifi on it. Maybe it’s talking to one of the neighbor’s unsecured wifi networks; I guess I can live with that.

        We got lucky on the refrigerator (this time, something inside broke and leaked water into the underfloor for a week before we caught it). We got a model that had everything we wanted and didn’t have wifi.

        I read an article a few months ago about a conference where all these companies are bitching that people are buying these things and not connecting them; with any luck, they’ve been losing money on them and will stop adding smart features to everything. But I’m not holding my breath.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah there’s this idea that we all want high tech, high surveillance everything. Fuck that, I want stuff that works right without accounts, or can work on a home hub or something like that. I hate feeling expected to load my phone with an app for everything I interact with

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I already have >500 accounts spread across various shops, game dev accounts (because every publisher needs its own launcher), services, etc.
          Too much data floating around the world because just another joe needed to seel some more data >_>

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s mostly because it’s all heavily integrated. The chipset that drives the smart platform also drives everything else, including the inputs and stuff.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of the “features” are profit motivated. Lots of companies love to be paid for bundling software on the device.