• Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait, if it’s double-blind, wouldn’t the scientists be unaware of whether he got a placebo or the real drug? Although I suppose this could be after the study has concluded. I would bet that in real studies they record the side effects reported before checking to see if it was the placebo or not!

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is basically like the many tests done on gluten sensitivity, where the people who claimed to have it and thought they were given bread claimed the usual symptoms, when they weren’t given anything of the sort. (And vice versa when they were given something they thought had no gluten, but did, and had no ill effects afterwards).

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 years ago

        What’s really crazy is that sometimes the placebo can still bring people relief even after knowing that it’s a placebo

        • Silverseren@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah. Though you ethically can’t try to use placebo as a medical treatment, because it’s inconsistent in whether it does anything and is essentially trying to not treat the patient at all with known methods of treatment.

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It is not completely excluded. For cases where the ‘standard’ treatment did not work or does not exist, placebo treatment can be used under the condition, that the patient is informed that they will be given placebo.

        • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          And the larger the pill, the better the placebo effect. That’s why we now have testicle sized pills.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wish that worked for me. I’d love to have someone give me a BS miracle drug sugar pill and actually be able to believe them. Even subconsciously. But subconsciously, I automatically disbelieve miracle claims (and even most efficacy claims) until looking at the clinical trial data.

          Years of chronic pain and gobs of different meds to control it, most entirely ineffective but with side effects, does things to a person already inclined toward doubt. I’m also prone to nocibo responses, like the guy in the comic, but I think it’s sensations that are always there, I’m just being asked not to ignore the state of my body like I usually do, so I actually notice them.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you know that placebo works, and know that it is placebo, then of course!

          • Bonehead@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Just remember that the placebo effect is only effective in a small percentage of the population, and is consistent with any other substances that may induce this phenomenon. That’s how they know when something actually works…it works in the majority of people, not just that small percentage.

      • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sure, but that’s just the placebo effect? I thought the double-blind process referred to something else in particular (hence the “double” part of the blind):

        A double-blind study blinds both the subjects as well as the researchers to the treatment allocation [1]

        In any case, I was mostly just curious, don’t intend to nit-pick the title :)

        [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546641/

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        If the experimenter never really interacts with the participants and there is no subjective measurement being made there isn’t really any benefit to being double blind, it’s just overhead at that point

        • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well then, how will they gloat and laugh in the participant’s face like in the comic?