• spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only person who seems offended in this post is you. Find an alternate source, or don’t, but when your only source is an unreliable one, don’t be upset when people don’t take it seriously.

    (None of what I said changes regardless of whether or not your article is 100% factual.)

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Just because it’s on the internet doesn’t make it “factual”. Get a clue.

        You know exactly what everyone here is saying and you’re not discussing in good faith.

        Your source is biased and lies all the time. What makes this time any different? Use multiple sources stating those same facts and then come back and present your findings.

        Don’t get mad when you use a biased source and nobody believes you.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        An unreliable source usually mixes facts with deception or manipulation. Showcasing a fact from an unreliable source does not make that source reliable or fact-based. The people here are not fooled. Please stop. It’s just weird at this point.